GPT-4o (2024-08-06) vs Reka Flash 3
GPT-4o (2024-08-06) leads Reka Flash 3 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 7.7 to 6.4, and Reka Flash 3 costs 50.0x less per output token ($0.20 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; 8 benchmarks have a result for both.
GPT-4o (2024-08-06) or Reka Flash 3: which to pick
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick GPT-4o (2024-08-06) for a larger context window (128K against 66K tokens) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.
- Shared results
- 8
- GPT-4o (2024-08-06) only
- 50
- Reka Flash 3 only
- 4
- Like-for-like categories
- 5 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
GPT-4o (2024-08-06)
GPT-4o (2024-08-06) leads, 7.7 against 6.4.
Same board, both measured
Math
AIME
No call
Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) has a AIME result, 14.0%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) has a MMLU Pro result, 74.1%.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
GPT-4o (2024-08-06)
GPT-4o (2024-08-06) takes 128K tokens against 66K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Reka Flash 3
GPT-4o (2024-08-06) $0.0075, Reka Flash 3 $0.0002 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- GPT-4o (2024-08-06) not benchmarked, Reka Flash 3 not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- Agentic work, 28.9 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
- Widest single gap
- Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): GPT-4o (2024-08-06) 41.0% against Reka Flash 3 0.0%, 41.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- GPT-4o (2024-08-06) $10.00 against Reka Flash 3 $0.20 per million output tokens, 50.0x apart.
- Context window
- GPT-4o (2024-08-06) takes 128K tokens, Reka Flash 3 66K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | GPT-4o (2024-08-06) | Bars | Reka Flash 3 | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 1 | 1 | ||
| Intelligence | 1 | 0 | ||
| Agentic work | 1 | 0 | ||
| Reasoning | 0 | 2 | ||
| General | 2 | 0 | ||
| All shared boards | 5 | 3 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index11
| Benchmark | GPT-4o (2024-08-06) | Reka Flash 3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aider polyglot | 23.1% | Not measured | Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured |
| SWE-bench Lite | 21.7% | Not measured | Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | 31.7% | 43.5% | Reka Flash 3 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 8.3% | 0.0% | GPT-4o (2024-08-06) |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1283 | Not measured | Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1278 | Not measured | Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | GPT-4o (2024-08-06) | Reka Flash 3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 7.7 | 6.4 | GPT-4o (2024-08-06) |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | GPT-4o (2024-08-06) | Reka Flash 3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 28.9% | 0.0% | GPT-4o (2024-08-06) |
| BALROG | Not measured | 29.2% | Only Reka Flash 3 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
| Benchmark | GPT-4o (2024-08-06) | Reka Flash 3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | 64.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 52.1% | 52.9% | Reka Flash 3 |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 2.3% | 4.4% | Reka Flash 3 |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 49.2% | Not measured | Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured |
| SimpleBench | 17.8% | Not measured | Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured |
| Chess puzzles | 6.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1264 | Not measured | Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1241 | Not measured | Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1277 | Not measured | Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here | |||
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GPT-4o (2024-08-06) | Reka Flash 3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | 14.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured |
| MATH 500 (Vals AI) | 75.2% | Not measured | Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured |
| MGSM (Vals AI) | 90.7% | Not measured | Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured |
| AA Math Index | Not measured | 33.7 | Only Reka Flash 3 measured |
| AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 33.7% | Only Reka Flash 3 measured |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 6.4% | Not measured | Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 0.4% | Not measured | Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured |
| MATH level 5 | 53.3% | Not measured | Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1285 | Not measured | Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1283 | Not measured | Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here | |||
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GPT-4o (2024-08-06) | Reka Flash 3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 74.1% | Not measured | Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 80.1% | Not measured | Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 39.4% | Not measured | Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 71.1% | Not measured | Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | 61.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured |
| MedQA (Vals AI) | 88.2% | Not measured | Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured |
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 66.9% | Only Reka Flash 3 measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | 26.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured |
| MMLU | 84.3% | Not measured | Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1274 | Not measured | Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1252 | Not measured | Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1275 | Not measured | Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1232 | Not measured | Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GPT-4o (2024-08-06) | Reka Flash 3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 9 boards here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
| Benchmark | GPT-4o (2024-08-06) | Reka Flash 3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFBench | 36.0% | 30.4% | GPT-4o (2024-08-06) |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 41.0% | 0.0% | GPT-4o (2024-08-06) |
| LMArena Text | 1283 | Not measured | Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1267 | Not measured | Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1274 | Not measured | Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured |
| LMArena Vision | 1065 | Not measured | Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1297 | Not measured | Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1262 | Not measured | Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1254 | Not measured | Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured |
| LMArena Text: German | 1257 | Not measured | Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1234 | Not measured | Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1218 | Not measured | Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured |
| LMArena Text: French | 1263 | Not measured | Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1269 | Not measured | Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1272 | Not measured | Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1279 | Not measured | Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1283 | Not measured | Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1290 | Not measured | Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1267 | Not measured | Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured |
| LMArena Vision: English | 1072 | Not measured | Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | 1009 | Not measured | Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GPT-4o (2024-08-06) | Reka Flash 3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Reka Flash 3 costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Reka Flash 3 costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Reka Flash 3 costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | OpenAI GPT-4o (2024-08-06) | Reka Flash 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | OpenAI | Reka |
| Weights | No public weights listed | Open weights |
| Released | August 6, 2024 | March 12, 2025 |
| Context window | 128K | 66K |
| Input $/Mtok | $2.50 | $0.10 |
| Output $/Mtok | $10.00 | $0.20 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is GPT-4o (2024-08-06) better than Reka Flash 3 for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GPT-4o (2024-08-06) for a larger context window (128K against 66K tokens) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.
Which is cheaper, GPT-4o (2024-08-06) or Reka Flash 3?
GPT-4o (2024-08-06) costs $2.50 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Reka Flash 3 costs $0.10 and $0.20. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4o (2024-08-06) or Reka Flash 3?
GPT-4o (2024-08-06), with 128K tokens against 66K.
How many benchmarks is the GPT-4o (2024-08-06) vs Reka Flash 3 comparison based on?
8 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 23, 2026. GPT-4o (2024-08-06)'s coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Reka Flash 3's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.