Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4o (2024-08-06) vs Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct leads GPT-4o (2024-08-06) on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 9.6 to 7.7, and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct costs 22.7x less per output token ($0.44 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 9 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-4o (2024-08-06)OpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
26.3
Output $/M
$10.00
3
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.44
6
vs boards won of 9 shared

GPT-4o (2024-08-06) or Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GPT-4o (2024-08-06) for work measured by SWE-bench Lite or LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Shared results
9
GPT-4o (2024-08-06) only
49
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct only
7
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4o (2024-08-06) not benchmarked, Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
Coding, 14.5 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
SWE-bench Lite: GPT-4o (2024-08-06) 21.7% against Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct 49.7%, 28.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-4o (2024-08-06) $10.00 against Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct $0.44 per million output tokens, 22.7x apart.
Context window
GPT-4o (2024-08-06) takes 128K tokens, Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-4o (2024-08-06)BarsQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructTies
Coding03
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning11
General20
All shared boards36
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-08-06)Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
Aider polyglot23.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured60.4%Only Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
SWE-bench Lite21.7%49.7%Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)31.7%40.3%Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)8.3%15.2%Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
LMArena Text: coding1283Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1278Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 36 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-08-06)Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence Index7.79.6Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-08-06)Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
τ²-Bench Telecom28.9%34.5%Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
Neither model has a result on the other 41 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-08-06)Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)64.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)52.1%51.6%GPT-4o (2024-08-06)
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)2.3%3.8%Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)49.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
SimpleBench17.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
Chess puzzles6.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1264Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: expert1241Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1277Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-08-06)Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
AIME14.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)75.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
MGSM (Vals AI)90.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
AA Math IndexNot measured29.0Only Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured29.0%Only Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
OTIS Mock AIME6.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 30.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
MATH level 553.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: math1285Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1283Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-08-06)Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
MMLU Pro74.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)80.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)39.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)71.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)61.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
MedQA (Vals AI)88.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured70.6%Only Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
SimpleQA Verified26.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
MMLU84.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: science1274Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1252Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1275Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1232Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-08-06)Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1087Only Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1044Only Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1085Only Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
General benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-08-06)Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
IFBench36.0%32.7%GPT-4o (2024-08-06)
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)41.0%32.7%GPT-4o (2024-08-06)
LMArena Text1283Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1267Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1274Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Vision1065Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: English1297Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: non-English1262Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1254Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: German1257Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1234Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: Korean1218Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: French1263Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1269Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: Russian1272Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1279Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1283Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1290Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1267Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Vision: English1072Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1009Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-08-06)Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-08-06)$0.0075Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct$0.0003Fits in one request

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-08-06)$0.155Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct$0.0068Fits in one request

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-08-06)$0.600Exceeds the context window
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct$0.026Fits in one request

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4o (2024-08-06)Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
MakerOpenAIQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 6, 2024July 31, 2025
Context window128K262K
Input $/Mtok$2.50$0.11
Output $/Mtok$10.00$0.44
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4o (2024-08-06) better than Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GPT-4o (2024-08-06) for work measured by SWE-bench Lite or LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o (2024-08-06) or Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct?

GPT-4o (2024-08-06) costs $2.50 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct costs $0.11 and $0.44. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4o (2024-08-06) or Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct?

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct, with 262K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-4o (2024-08-06) vs Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct comparison based on?

9 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GPT-4o (2024-08-06)'s coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next