Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4o (2024-08-06) vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL leads GPT-4o (2024-08-06) on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 26.5 to 7.7, and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs 20.0x less per output token ($0.50 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; 3 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-4o (2024-08-06)OpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
26.3
Output $/M
$10.00
0
Nemotron 3.5 Super VLNVIDIA
Coding
No data
Overall
35.6
Output $/M
$0.50
3
vs boards won of 3 shared

GPT-4o (2024-08-06) or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GPT-4o (2024-08-06) for work measured by AA Intelligence Index or Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Shared results
3
GPT-4o (2024-08-06) only
55
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL only
13
Like-for-like categories
3 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4o (2024-08-06) not benchmarked, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL not benchmarked.
Widest category
Reasoning, 28.4 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run): GPT-4o (2024-08-06) 2.3% against Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 30.7%, 28.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-4o (2024-08-06) $10.00 against Nemotron 3.5 Super VL $0.50 per million output tokens, 20.0x apart.
Context window
GPT-4o (2024-08-06) takes 128K tokens, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-4o (2024-08-06)BarsNemotron 3.5 Super VLTies
Intelligence01
Reasoning01
General01
All shared boards03
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index8 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-08-06)Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
Aider polyglot23.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
SWE-bench Lite21.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LiveBench codingNot measured65.5%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)31.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
SciCodeNot measured47.8%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)8.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: coding1283Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1278Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-08-06)Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
AA Intelligence Index7.726.5Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-08-06)Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
LiveBench researchNot measured70.9%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
LiveBench browserNot measured4.0%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured15.8%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
τ²-Bench Telecom28.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-08-06)Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
LiveBench reasoningNot measured78.8%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)64.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)52.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)2.3%30.7%Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)49.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
SimpleBench17.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
Chess puzzles6.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1264Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: expert1241Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1277Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-08-06)Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
AIME14.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)75.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
MGSM (Vals AI)90.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
OTIS Mock AIME6.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 30.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
MATH level 553.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: math1285Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1283Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-08-06)Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
MMLU Pro74.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)80.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)39.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)71.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)61.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
MedQA (Vals AI)88.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
SimpleQA Verified26.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
MMLU84.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: science1274Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1252Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1275Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1232Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-08-06)Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1172Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1148Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1110Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1127Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1154Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
LiveBench designNot measured60.7%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
General benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-08-06)Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured64.6%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
IFBench36.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)41.0%69.0%Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
LMArena Text1283Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1267Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1274Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Vision1065Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: English1297Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: non-English1262Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1254Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: German1257Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1234Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: Korean1218Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: French1263Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1269Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: Russian1272Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1279Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1283Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1290Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1267Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Vision: English1072Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1009Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-08-06)Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-08-06)$0.0075Fits in one request
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.0004Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-08-06)$0.155Fits in one request
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.0090Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-08-06)$0.600Exceeds the context window
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.035Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4o (2024-08-06)NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
MakerOpenAINVIDIA
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 6, 2024October 15, 2026
Context window128K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$2.50$0.15
Output $/Mtok$10.00$0.50
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4o (2024-08-06) better than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GPT-4o (2024-08-06) for work measured by AA Intelligence Index or Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o (2024-08-06) or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

GPT-4o (2024-08-06) costs $2.50 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs $0.15 and $0.50. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4o (2024-08-06) or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-4o (2024-08-06) vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL comparison based on?

3 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 23, 2026. GPT-4o (2024-08-06)'s coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next