Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) vs GPT-4o (2024-08-06)

GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) costs 5.0x less per output token than GPT-4o (2024-08-06) ($2.00 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; 1 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)OpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.00
0
GPT-4o (2024-08-06)OpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
26.3
Output $/M
$10.00
1
vs boards won of 1 shared

GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) or GPT-4o (2024-08-06): which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) for output tokens 5.0x cheaper ($2.00 vs $10.00 per million) and work measured by MMLU, where it leads.

Shared results
1
GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) only
2
GPT-4o (2024-08-06) only
57
Like-for-like categories
1 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) not benchmarked, GPT-4o (2024-08-06) not benchmarked.
Widest category
Knowledge, 15.4 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
MMLU: GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) 68.9% against GPT-4o (2024-08-06) 84.3%, 15.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) $2.00 against GPT-4o (2024-08-06) $10.00 per million output tokens, 5.0x apart.
Context window
GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) takes 4K tokens, GPT-4o (2024-08-06) 128K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)BarsGPT-4o (2024-08-06)Ties
Knowledge01
All shared boards01
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index6 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) and GPT-4o (2024-08-06)
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)GPT-4o (2024-08-06)Leader
Aider polyglotNot measured23.1%Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
SWE-bench LiteNot measured21.7%Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured31.7%Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured8.3%Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1283Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1278Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) and GPT-4o (2024-08-06)
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)GPT-4o (2024-08-06)Leader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured7.7Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) and GPT-4o (2024-08-06)
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)GPT-4o (2024-08-06)Leader
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured28.9%Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 41 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) and GPT-4o (2024-08-06)
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)GPT-4o (2024-08-06)Leader
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured64.0%Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured52.1%Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured2.3%Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured49.2%Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
SimpleBenchNot measured17.8%Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured6.0%Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1264Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1241Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1277Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) and GPT-4o (2024-08-06)
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)GPT-4o (2024-08-06)Leader
AIMENot measured14.0%Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)Not measured75.2%Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured90.7%Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured6.4%Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured0.4%Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
MATH level 5Not measured53.3%Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
GSM8K46.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1285Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1283Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) and GPT-4o (2024-08-06)
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)GPT-4o (2024-08-06)Leader
MMLU ProNot measured74.1%Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured80.1%Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured39.4%Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured71.1%Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured61.0%Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured88.2%Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured26.0%Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
MMLU68.9%84.3%GPT-4o (2024-08-06)
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1274Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1252Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1275Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1232Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) and GPT-4o (2024-08-06)
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)GPT-4o (2024-08-06)Leader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index22 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) and GPT-4o (2024-08-06)
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)GPT-4o (2024-08-06)Leader
IFBenchNot measured36.0%Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured41.0%Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
WinoGrande81.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) measured
LMArena TextNot measured1283Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1267Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1274Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1065Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1297Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1262Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1254Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1257Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1234Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1218Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1263Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1269Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1272Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1279Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1283Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1290Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1267Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1072Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1009Only GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) and GPT-4o (2024-08-06)
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)GPT-4o (2024-08-06)Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)$0.0020Fits in one request
GPT-4o (2024-08-06)$0.0075Fits in one request

GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)$0.056Exceeds the context window
GPT-4o (2024-08-06)$0.155Fits in one request

GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)$0.220Exceeds the context window
GPT-4o (2024-08-06)$0.600Exceeds the context window

GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) and GPT-4o (2024-08-06)
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)OpenAI GPT-4o (2024-08-06)
MakerOpenAIOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedJanuary 25, 2024August 6, 2024
Context window4K128K
Input $/Mtok$1.00$2.50
Output $/Mtok$2.00$10.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) better than GPT-4o (2024-08-06) for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) for output tokens 5.0x cheaper ($2.00 vs $10.00 per million) and work measured by MMLU, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) or GPT-4o (2024-08-06)?

GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) costs $1.00 per million input tokens and $2.00 per million output tokens; GPT-4o (2024-08-06) costs $2.50 and $10.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) or GPT-4o (2024-08-06)?

GPT-4o (2024-08-06), with 128K tokens against 4K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) vs GPT-4o (2024-08-06) comparison based on?

1 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 23, 2026. GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)'s coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and GPT-4o (2024-08-06)'s on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next