Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GLM 4.5V vs Mistral Large 3 2512

Mistral Large 3 2512 leads GLM 4.5V on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 9.3 to 7.6, and Mistral Large 3 2512 costs 1.2x less per output token ($1.50 vs $1.80 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 1 benchmarks have a result for both.

GLM 4.5VZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
7.6
Output $/M
$1.80
0
Mistral Large 3 2512Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
9.3
Output $/M
$1.50
1
vs boards won of 1 shared

GLM 4.5V or Mistral Large 3 2512: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GLM 4.5V for work measured by AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Shared results
1
GLM 4.5V only
39
Mistral Large 3 2512 only
27
Like-for-like categories
1 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GLM 4.5V not benchmarked, Mistral Large 3 2512 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Intelligence, 1.7 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AA Intelligence Index: GLM 4.5V 7.6 against Mistral Large 3 2512 9.3, 1.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GLM 4.5V $1.80 against Mistral Large 3 2512 $1.50 per million output tokens, 1.2x apart.
Context window
GLM 4.5V takes 66K tokens, Mistral Large 3 2512 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGLM 4.5VBarsMistral Large 3 2512Ties
Intelligence01
All shared boards01
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index8 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for GLM 4.5V and Mistral Large 3 2512
BenchmarkGLM 4.5VMistral Large 3 2512Leader
AA Coding IndexNot measured20.1Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured55.3%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured41.4%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)60.4%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5V measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)6.8%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5V measured
ALE-BenchNot measured264.7Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
LMArena Text: coding1347Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1353Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5V measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for GLM 4.5V and Mistral Large 3 2512
BenchmarkGLM 4.5VMistral Large 3 2512Leader
AA Intelligence Index7.69.3Mistral Large 3 2512
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GLM 4.5V and Mistral Large 3 2512
BenchmarkGLM 4.5VMistral Large 3 2512Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured1.0Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom22.5%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5V measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for GLM 4.5V and Mistral Large 3 2512
BenchmarkGLM 4.5VMistral Large 3 2512Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured68.4%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured66.2%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)68.4%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5V measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)6.3%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1335Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Text: expert1353Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1357Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1151Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Vision: homework1163Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5V measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GLM 4.5V and Mistral Large 3 2512
BenchmarkGLM 4.5VMistral Large 3 2512Leader
AIMENot measured42.9%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured85.4%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
AA Math Index73.0Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5V measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)73.0%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Text: math1354Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1336Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5V measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GLM 4.5V and Mistral Large 3 2512
BenchmarkGLM 4.5VMistral Large 3 2512Leader
MMLU ProNot measured79.8%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured79.1%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured61.4%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured61.0%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured73.1%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured52.1%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured82.2%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)78.8%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Text: science1330Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1349Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1338Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1309Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5V measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GLM 4.5V and Mistral Large 3 2512
BenchmarkGLM 4.5VMistral Large 3 2512Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1162Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1102Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1080Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1136Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1100Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1142Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured993Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1069Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index21 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for GLM 4.5V and Mistral Large 3 2512
BenchmarkGLM 4.5VMistral Large 3 2512Leader
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured24.6%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
IFBench34.2%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5V measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)0.0%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5V measured
DTBenchNot measured65.1%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
LMCANot measured16.7%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
LMArena Text1333Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1311Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1294Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Vision1154Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Text: English1362Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Text: non-English1303Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1337Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1336Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Text: Russian1298Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Text: Polish1302Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1333Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1305Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1302Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1303Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Vision: English1183Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1151Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5V measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GLM 4.5V and Mistral Large 3 2512
BenchmarkGLM 4.5VMistral Large 3 2512Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GLM 4.5V$0.0015Fits in one request
Mistral Large 3 2512$0.0013Fits in one request

Mistral Large 3 2512 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GLM 4.5V$0.035Fits in one request
Mistral Large 3 2512$0.029Fits in one request

Mistral Large 3 2512 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GLM 4.5V$0.138Exceeds the context window
Mistral Large 3 2512$0.115Fits in one request

Mistral Large 3 2512 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GLM 4.5V and Mistral Large 3 2512
SpecificationZ.ai GLM 4.5VMistral Large 3 2512
MakerZ.aiMistral AI
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedAugust 11, 2025December 1, 2025
Context window66K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.60$0.50
Output $/Mtok$1.80$1.50
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.77
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GLM 4.5V better than Mistral Large 3 2512 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GLM 4.5V for work measured by AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GLM 4.5V or Mistral Large 3 2512?

GLM 4.5V costs $0.60 per million input tokens and $1.80 per million output tokens; Mistral Large 3 2512 costs $0.50 and $1.50. Cost per solved task is known for Mistral Large 3 2512 only.

Which has the bigger context window, GLM 4.5V or Mistral Large 3 2512?

Mistral Large 3 2512, with 262K tokens against 66K.

How many benchmarks is the GLM 4.5V vs Mistral Large 3 2512 comparison based on?

1 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GLM 4.5V's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Mistral Large 3 2512's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next