Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GLM 4.5 vs Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507

GLM 4.5 leads Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 12.8 to 12.0, and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 costs 2.9x less per output token ($0.75 vs $2.20 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 18 benchmarks have a result for both.

GLM 4.5Z.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.20
9
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Qwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.75
9
vs boards won of 18 shared

GLM 4.5 or Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GLM 4.5 for work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or τ²-Bench Telecom, where it leads.

Shared results
18
GLM 4.5 only
43
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 only
6
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GLM 4.5 not benchmarked, Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Web design, 18.2 points apart on average over 6 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: game dev: GLM 4.5 1144 against Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 951, 24.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GLM 4.5 $2.20 against Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 $0.75 per million output tokens, 2.9x apart.
Context window
GLM 4.5 takes 131K tokens, Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGLM 4.5BarsQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Ties
Coding21
Intelligence10
Agentic work01
Reasoning02
Math02
Knowledge01
Web design60
General02
All shared boards99
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index21
Coding benchmarks for GLM 4.5 and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkGLM 4.5Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
SWE-bench Verified64.2%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)67.5%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)73.8%78.8%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
SciCodeNot measured41.4%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)22.0%15.2%GLM 4.5
WeirdML40.6%38.7%GLM 4.5
ALE-Bench344.8Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: coding1434Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1440Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for GLM 4.5 and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkGLM 4.5Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
AA Intelligence Index12.812.0GLM 4.5
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for GLM 4.5 and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkGLM 4.5Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
τ²-Bench Telecom43.0%53.2%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)Not measured52.1%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for GLM 4.5 and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkGLM 4.5Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
GPQA Diamond72.2%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)78.2%79.0%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)13.0%15.9%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
ARC-AGINot measured11.0%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured1.3%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1429Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: expert1433Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1429Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark57.9%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for GLM 4.5 and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkGLM 4.5Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
AIME86.7%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)94.0%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)90.8%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
AA Math Index73.791.0Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)73.7%91.0%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: math1427Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1430Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Knowledge benchmarks for GLM 4.5 and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkGLM 4.5Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
MMLU Pro81.2%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)75.6%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)61.0%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)72.4%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)90.0%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)83.5%84.3%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: science1444Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1455Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1438Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1420Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
Web design benchmarks for GLM 4.5 and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkGLM 4.5Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
Design Arena: websites11691058GLM 4.5
Design Arena: UI components1141962GLM 4.5
Design Arena: game dev1144951GLM 4.5
Design Arena: data viz11591070GLM 4.5
Design Arena: 3D1170994GLM 4.5
Design Arena: all code categories11651038GLM 4.5
Design Arena: SVG1096Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
General benchmarks for GLM 4.5 and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkGLM 4.5Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
IFBench44.1%51.2%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)52.7%72.0%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
DTBenchNot measured78.4%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
LMCANot measured23.5%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)73.4%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
LMArena Text1430Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1404Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1395Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: English1437Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1417Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1465Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: German1407Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1415Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1380Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: French1418Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1454Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1413Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1422Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1415Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1412Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1403Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1404Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GLM 4.5 and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkGLM 4.5Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GLM 4.5$0.0017Fits in one request
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507$0.0005Fits in one request

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GLM 4.5$0.037Fits in one request
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507$0.0097Fits in one request

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GLM 4.5$0.142Exceeds the context window
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507$0.037Fits in one request

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GLM 4.5 and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
SpecificationZ.ai GLM 4.5Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
MakerZ.aiQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 25, 2025July 21, 2025
Context window131K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.60$0.15
Output $/Mtok$2.20$0.75
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GLM 4.5 better than Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GLM 4.5 for work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or τ²-Bench Telecom, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GLM 4.5 or Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507?

GLM 4.5 costs $0.60 per million input tokens and $2.20 per million output tokens; Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 costs $0.15 and $0.75. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GLM 4.5 or Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507?

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507, with 262K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the GLM 4.5 vs Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 comparison based on?

18 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GLM 4.5's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next