Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GLM 4.5 vs GLM 5 Turbo

GLM 5 Turbo leads GLM 4.5 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 26.6 to 12.8, and GLM 4.5 costs 1.8x less per output token ($2.20 vs $4.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 15 benchmarks have a result for both.

GLM 4.5Z.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.20
0
GLM 5 TurboZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$4.00
15
vs boards won of 15 shared

GLM 4.5 or GLM 5 Turbo: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GLM 4.5 for output tokens 1.8x cheaper ($2.20 vs $4.00 per million) and work measured by Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) or ALE-Bench, where it leads.

Shared results
15
GLM 4.5 only
46
GLM 5 Turbo only
1
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GLM 4.5 not benchmarked, GLM 5 Turbo not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 55.6 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: GLM 4.5 43.0% against GLM 5 Turbo 98.5%, 55.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GLM 4.5 $2.20 against GLM 5 Turbo $4.00 per million output tokens, 1.8x apart.
Context window
GLM 4.5 takes 131K tokens, GLM 5 Turbo 203K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGLM 4.5BarsGLM 5 TurboTies
Coding02
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning02
Web design07
General02
All shared boards015
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for GLM 4.5 and GLM 5 Turbo
BenchmarkGLM 4.5GLM 5 TurboLeader
SWE-bench Verified64.2%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)67.5%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)73.8%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)22.0%33.3%GLM 5 Turbo
WeirdML40.6%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
ALE-Bench344.8634.0GLM 5 Turbo
LMArena Text: coding1434Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1440Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for GLM 4.5 and GLM 5 Turbo
BenchmarkGLM 4.5GLM 5 TurboLeader
AA Intelligence Index12.826.6GLM 5 Turbo
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for GLM 4.5 and GLM 5 Turbo
BenchmarkGLM 4.5GLM 5 TurboLeader
τ²-Bench Telecom43.0%98.5%GLM 5 Turbo
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for GLM 4.5 and GLM 5 Turbo
BenchmarkGLM 4.5GLM 5 TurboLeader
GPQA Diamond72.2%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)78.2%84.7%GLM 5 Turbo
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)13.0%27.8%GLM 5 Turbo
LMArena Text: hard prompts1429Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: expert1433Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1429Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark57.9%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GLM 4.5 and GLM 5 Turbo
BenchmarkGLM 4.5GLM 5 TurboLeader
AIME86.7%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)94.0%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)90.8%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
AA Math Index73.7Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)73.7%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: math1427Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1430Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GLM 4.5 and GLM 5 Turbo
BenchmarkGLM 4.5GLM 5 TurboLeader
MMLU Pro81.2%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)75.6%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)61.0%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)72.4%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)90.0%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)83.5%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: science1444Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1455Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1438Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1420Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index07
Web design benchmarks for GLM 4.5 and GLM 5 Turbo
BenchmarkGLM 4.5GLM 5 TurboLeader
Design Arena: websites11691262GLM 5 Turbo
Design Arena: UI components11411260GLM 5 Turbo
Design Arena: game dev11441248GLM 5 Turbo
Design Arena: data viz11591264GLM 5 Turbo
Design Arena: 3D11701247GLM 5 Turbo
Design Arena: all code categories11651261GLM 5 Turbo
Design Arena: SVG10961205GLM 5 Turbo
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1160Only GLM 5 Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
General benchmarks for GLM 4.5 and GLM 5 Turbo
BenchmarkGLM 4.5GLM 5 TurboLeader
IFBench44.1%73.2%GLM 5 Turbo
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)52.7%71.7%GLM 5 Turbo
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)73.4%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
LMArena Text1430Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1404Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1395Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: English1437Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1417Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1465Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: German1407Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1415Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1380Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: French1418Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1454Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1413Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1422Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1415Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1412Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1403Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1404Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GLM 4.5 and GLM 5 Turbo
BenchmarkGLM 4.5GLM 5 TurboLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GLM 4.5$0.0017Fits in one request
GLM 5 Turbo$0.0032Fits in one request

GLM 4.5 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GLM 4.5$0.037Fits in one request
GLM 5 Turbo$0.072Fits in one request

GLM 4.5 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GLM 4.5$0.142Exceeds the context window
GLM 5 Turbo$0.280Exceeds the context window

GLM 4.5 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GLM 4.5 and GLM 5 Turbo
SpecificationZ.ai GLM 4.5Z.ai GLM 5 Turbo
MakerZ.aiZ.ai
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedJuly 25, 2025March 15, 2026
Context window131K203K
Input $/Mtok$0.60$1.20
Output $/Mtok$2.20$4.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GLM 4.5 better than GLM 5 Turbo for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GLM 4.5 for output tokens 1.8x cheaper ($2.20 vs $4.00 per million) and work measured by Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) or ALE-Bench, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GLM 4.5 or GLM 5 Turbo?

GLM 4.5 costs $0.60 per million input tokens and $2.20 per million output tokens; GLM 5 Turbo costs $1.20 and $4.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GLM 4.5 or GLM 5 Turbo?

GLM 5 Turbo, with 203K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the GLM 4.5 vs GLM 5 Turbo comparison based on?

15 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GLM 4.5's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and GLM 5 Turbo's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next