Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs 2.3x less per output token than Gemini 2.5 Flash ($1.10 vs $2.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 25 benchmarks have a result for both.

Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogle
Coding
No data
Overall
34.3
Output $/M
$2.50
6
R Beam 1.0 501B A23BReflection
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.10
19
vs boards won of 25 shared

Gemini 2.5 Flash or Beam 1.0 501B A23B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Gemini 2.5 Flash for work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Shared results
25
Gemini 2.5 Flash only
48
Beam 1.0 501B A23B only
3
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 2.5 Flash not benchmarked, Beam 1.0 501B A23B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Web design, 24.8 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: game dev: Gemini 2.5 Flash 1004 against Beam 1.0 501B A23B 1224, 27.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 2.5 Flash $2.50 against Beam 1.0 501B A23B $1.10 per million output tokens, 2.3x apart.
Context window
Both take 1.05M tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 2.5 FlashBarsBeam 1.0 501B A23BTies
Coding02
Reasoning03
Math02
Knowledge22
Web design02
General48
All shared boards619
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
SWE-bench Verified28.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1437Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)69.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)13.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench17.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: coding14231473Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: software and IT14251461Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1443Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1436Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
AA Intelligence Index15.5Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Epoch Capabilities Index142.9Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
τ²-Bench Telecom31.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
BALROG33.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Vending-Bench 2$549Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)56.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
BrowseComp-Plus39.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 36 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)79.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)12.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
ARC-AGI33.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
ARC-AGI-22.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
SimpleBench41.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14221442Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: expert14261447Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14201451Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Vision: diagrams1245Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: homework1244Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark56.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
AA Math Index73.3Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)73.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: math14111459Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: mathematical work14221475Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index22
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
MedCode (Vals AI)40.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)83.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: science14331430Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14281376Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Text: legal and government14301433Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: business and finance14041430Beam 1.0 501B A23B
FACTS Benchmark Suite47.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
Design Arena: websites10741250Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Design Arena: UI components1002Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: game dev10041224Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Design Arena: data viz1060Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: 3D1020Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: all code categories1059Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: SVG1020Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index48
General benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)44.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)83.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
IFBench50.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)65.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
DTBench76.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMCA27.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text14171425Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: instruction following14051430Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: creative writing14001390Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Vision1235Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: English14181436Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: non-English14091413Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: Chinese14491424Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Text: German1417Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1396Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Korean1385Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: French14321461Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: Spanish1422Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Russian14151412Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Text: Polish1413Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn14081414Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: longer queries14191429Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: writing and language14051400Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13931399Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Vision: English1239Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1284Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1237Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: humor1225Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1277Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1252Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1241Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash$0.0015Fits in one request
Beam 1.0 501B A23B$0.0009Fits in one request

Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash$0.022Fits in one request
Beam 1.0 501B A23B$0.021Fits in one request

Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash$0.085Fits in one request
Beam 1.0 501B A23B$0.081Fits in one request

Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 2.5 Flash and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 2.5 FlashReflection Beam 1.0 501B A23B
MakerGoogleReflection
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedJune 17, 2025October 16, 2026
Context window1.05M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.30$0.35
Output $/Mtok$2.50$1.10
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved task$0.466Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 2.5 Flash better than Beam 1.0 501B A23B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Gemini 2.5 Flash for work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?

Gemini 2.5 Flash costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs $0.35 and $1.10. Cost per solved task is known for Gemini 2.5 Flash only.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 2.5 Flash or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?

Neither: both take 1.05M tokens.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B comparison based on?

25 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Gemini 2.5 Flash's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Beam 1.0 501B A23B's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next