Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Gemini 2.5 Flash leads Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 15.5 to 9.9, and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs 1.3x less per output token ($1.90 vs $2.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 49 benchmarks have a result for both.

Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogle
Coding
No data
Overall
34.3
Output $/M
$2.50
17
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.90
32
vs boards won of 49 shared

Gemini 2.5 Flash or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Gemini 2.5 Flash for a larger context window (1.05M against 262K tokens) and work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Shared results
49
Gemini 2.5 Flash only
24
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct only
0
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 2.5 Flash not benchmarked, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 22.5 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: Gemini 2.5 Flash 31.6% against Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct 54.1%, 22.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 2.5 Flash $2.50 against Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct $1.90 per million output tokens, 1.3x apart.
Context window
Gemini 2.5 Flash takes 1.05M tokens, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 2.5 FlashBarsQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructTies
Coding22
Intelligence10
Agentic work01
Reasoning25
Math13
Knowledge05
General1116
All shared boards1732
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index22
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
SWE-bench Verified28.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)69.5%64.6%Gemini 2.5 Flash
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)13.6%11.4%Gemini 2.5 Flash
Terminal-Bench17.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: coding14231438Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: software and IT14251442Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence Index15.59.9Gemini 2.5 Flash
Epoch Capabilities Index142.9Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
τ²-Bench Telecom31.6%54.1%Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BALROG33.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Vending-Bench 2$549Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)56.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
BrowseComp-Plus39.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 36 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index25
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)79.0%77.2%Gemini 2.5 Flash
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)12.1%11.9%Gemini 2.5 Flash
ARC-AGI33.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
ARC-AGI-22.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
SimpleBench41.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14221428Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: expert14261442Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14201439Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Vision: diagrams12451255Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Vision: homework12441277Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Kagi LLM Benchmark56.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13
Math benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
AA Math Index73.388.3Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)73.3%88.3%Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: math14111425Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: mathematical work14221419Gemini 2.5 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
MedCode (Vals AI)40.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)83.2%83.6%Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: science14331444Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14281431Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: legal and government14301438Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: business and finance14041433Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
FACTS Benchmark Suite47.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
Design Arena: websites1074Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: UI components1002Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: game dev1004Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: data viz1060Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: 3D1020Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: all code categories1059Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: SVG1020Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1116
General benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)44.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)83.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
IFBench50.3%56.5%Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)65.3%63.7%Gemini 2.5 Flash
DTBench76.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMCA27.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text14171420Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: instruction following14051406Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: creative writing14001366Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Vision12351247Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: English14181429Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: non-English14091405Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Text: Chinese14491463Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: German14171424Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Japanese13961385Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Text: Korean13851394Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: French14321452Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Spanish14221428Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Russian14151408Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Text: Polish14131419Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: multi-turn14081428Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: longer queries14191419Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: writing and language14051392Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13931368Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Vision: English12391256Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Vision: Chinese12841283Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Vision: reading text12371253Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Vision: humor12251209Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Vision: captioning12771281Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Vision: recognizing things12521249Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Vision: creative writing12411220Gemini 2.5 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash$0.0015Fits in one request
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct$0.0012Fits in one request

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash$0.022Fits in one request
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct$0.016Fits in one request

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash$0.085Fits in one request
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct$0.061Fits in one request

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 2.5 Flash and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 2.5 FlashQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
MakerGoogleQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedJune 17, 2025September 23, 2025
Context window1.05M262K
Input $/Mtok$0.30$0.21
Output $/Mtok$2.50$1.90
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved task$0.466Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 2.5 Flash better than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Gemini 2.5 Flash for a larger context window (1.05M against 262K tokens) and work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

Gemini 2.5 Flash costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs $0.21 and $1.90. Cost per solved task is known for Gemini 2.5 Flash only.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 2.5 Flash or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

Gemini 2.5 Flash, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct comparison based on?

49 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Gemini 2.5 Flash's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next