Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Gemini 2.5 Flash leads Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 15.5 to 8.9, and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs 11.4x less per output token ($0.22 vs $2.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 39 benchmarks have a result for both.
Gemini 2.5 Flash or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: which to pick
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick Gemini 2.5 Flash for a larger context window (1.05M against 262K tokens) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or τ²-Bench Telecom, where it leads.
- Shared results
- 39
- Gemini 2.5 Flash only
- 34
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B only
- 3
- Like-for-like categories
- 7 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash leads, 15.5 against 8.9.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has a AA Agentic Index result, 1.0.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only Gemini 2.5 Flash has a Design Arena: websites result, 1074.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash takes 1.05M tokens against 262K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Gemini 2.5 Flash $0.0015, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B $0.0002 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only Gemini 2.5 Flash has the number, $0.466.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- Gemini 2.5 Flash not benchmarked, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- General, 16.1 points apart on average over 19 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): Gemini 2.5 Flash 65.3% against Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B 38.0%, 27.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Gemini 2.5 Flash $2.50 against Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B $0.22 per million output tokens, 11.4x apart.
- Context window
- Gemini 2.5 Flash takes 1.05M tokens, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B 262K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Bars | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 2 | 1 | 1 tie | |
| Intelligence | 1 | 0 | ||
| Agentic work | 0 | 1 | ||
| Reasoning | 5 | 0 | ||
| Math | 2 | 2 | ||
| Knowledge | 5 | 0 | ||
| General | 18 | 1 | ||
| All shared boards | 33 | 5 | 1 tie |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index21
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 28.7% | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| AA Coding Index | Not measured | 14.4 | Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | 69.5% | 74.1% | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B |
| SciCode | Not measured | 30.6% | Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 13.6% | 13.6% | Tie |
| Terminal-Bench | 17.1% | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1423 | 1378 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1425 | 1383 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 15.5 | 8.9 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 142.9 | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | Not measured | 1.0 | Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 31.6% | 40.9% | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B |
| BALROG | 33.5% | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | $549 | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) | 56.2% | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| BrowseComp-Plus | 39.9% | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 79.0% | 75.7% | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 12.1% | 11.4% | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| ARC-AGI | 33.3% | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 2.5% | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| SimpleBench | 41.2% | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1422 | 1348 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1426 | 1355 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1420 | 1376 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | 1245 | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | 1244 | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 56.8% | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index22
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Math Index | 73.3 | 91.0 | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B |
| AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run) | 73.3% | 91.0% | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B |
| LMArena Text: math | 1411 | 1371 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1422 | 1375 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 40.4% | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | 83.2% | 79.4% | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: science | 1433 | 1353 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1428 | 1349 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1430 | 1341 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1404 | 1346 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| FACTS Benchmark Suite | 47.2% | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1074 | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1002 | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1004 | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1060 | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1020 | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1059 | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1020 | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index181
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 44.8% | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 83.0% | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| IFBench | 50.3% | 71.1% | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 65.3% | 38.0% | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| DTBench | 76.5% | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| LMCA | 27.5% | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text | 1417 | 1348 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1405 | 1303 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1400 | 1269 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| LMArena Vision | 1235 | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1418 | 1377 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1409 | 1320 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1449 | 1383 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: German | 1417 | 1348 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1396 | 1268 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1385 | 1269 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: French | 1432 | 1396 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1422 | 1376 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1415 | 1304 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1413 | 1303 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1408 | 1319 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1419 | 1300 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1405 | 1283 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1393 | 1293 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| LMArena Vision: English | 1239 | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | 1284 | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | 1237 | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| LMArena Vision: humor | 1225 | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| LMArena Vision: captioning | 1277 | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| LMArena Vision: recognizing things | 1252 | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | 1241 | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Google Gemini 2.5 Flash | NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | NVIDIA | |
| Weights | No public weights listed | Open weights |
| Released | June 17, 2025 | December 14, 2025 |
| Context window | 1.05M | 262K |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.30 | $0.055 |
| Output $/Mtok | $2.50 | $0.22 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | $0.466 | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash better than Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Gemini 2.5 Flash for a larger context window (1.05M against 262K tokens) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or τ²-Bench Telecom, where it leads.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?
Gemini 2.5 Flash costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs $0.055 and $0.22. Cost per solved task is known for Gemini 2.5 Flash only.
Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 2.5 Flash or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?
Gemini 2.5 Flash, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks is the Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B comparison based on?
39 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Gemini 2.5 Flash's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.