Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Mistral Large 2407

Updated October 21, 2026. 12 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogle
Coding
No data
Overall
15.5
Output $/M
$2.50
11
Mistral Large 2407Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
7.6
Output $/M
$6.00
1
vs boards won of 12 shared

Decision reading

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Gemini 2.5 Flash has the edge where output tokens cost 2.4x less, and where the context window is larger, 1.05M against 131K tokens.

Shared results
12
Gemini 2.5 Flash only
57
Mistral Large 2407 only
5
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 2.5 Flash not benchmarked, Mistral Large 2407 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Math, 73.3 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run): Gemini 2.5 Flash 73.3% against Mistral Large 2407 0.0%, 73.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 2.5 Flash $2.50 against Mistral Large 2407 $6.00 per million output tokens, 2.4x apart.
Context window
Gemini 2.5 Flash takes 1.05M tokens, Mistral Large 2407 131K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 2.5 FlashBarsMistral Large 2407Ties
Coding10
Intelligence10
Agentic work01
Reasoning30
Math20
Knowledge10
General30
All shared boards111
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index10
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashMistral Large 2407Leader
SWE-bench Verified28.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)69.5%26.7%Gemini 2.5 Flash
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)13.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench17.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: coding1423Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1425Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashMistral Large 2407Leader
AA Intelligence Index15.57.6Gemini 2.5 Flash
Epoch Capabilities Index142.9Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashMistral Large 2407Leader
τ²-Bench Telecom31.6%33.0%Mistral Large 2407
BALROG33.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Vending-Bench 2$549Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 36 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashMistral Large 2407Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)79.0%47.2%Gemini 2.5 Flash
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)12.1%2.9%Gemini 2.5 Flash
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured49.0%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
ARC-AGI33.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
ARC-AGI-22.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
SimpleBench41.2%22.5%Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Text: hard prompts1422Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: expert1426Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1420Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1245Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: homework1244Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashMistral Large 2407Leader
AA Math Index73.30.0Gemini 2.5 Flash
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)73.3%0.0%Gemini 2.5 Flash
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured8.5%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
MATH level 5Not measured44.8%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
LMArena Text: math1411Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1422Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashMistral Large 2407Leader
MedCode (Vals AI)40.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)83.2%68.3%Gemini 2.5 Flash
MMLUNot measured80.0%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
LMArena Text: science1433Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1428Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1430Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1404Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashMistral Large 2407Leader
Design Arena: websites1074Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: UI components1005Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: game dev1005Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: data viz1060Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: 3D1021Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: all code categories1059Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: SVG1020Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
General benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashMistral Large 2407Leader
SAGE (Vals AI)44.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)83.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
IFBench50.3%31.6%Gemini 2.5 Flash
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)65.3%2.0%Gemini 2.5 Flash
DTBench76.5%61.2%Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMCA27.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured69.0%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
LMArena Text1417Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1405Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1400Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision1235Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: English1418Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: non-English1409Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1449Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: German1417Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1396Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Korean1385Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: French1432Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1422Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Russian1415Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Polish1413Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1408Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1419Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1405Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1393Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: English1239Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1284Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1237Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: humor1225Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1277Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1252Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1241Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashMistral Large 2407Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash$0.0015Fits in one request
Mistral Large 2407$0.0050Fits in one request

Gemini 2.5 Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash$0.022Fits in one request
Mistral Large 2407$0.118Fits in one request

Gemini 2.5 Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash$0.085Fits in one request
Mistral Large 2407$0.460Exceeds the context window

Gemini 2.5 Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 2.5 Flash and Mistral Large 2407
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 2.5 FlashMistral Large 2407
MakerGoogleMistral AI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedJune 17, 2025November 19, 2024
Context window1.05M131K
Input $/Mtok$0.30$2.00
Output $/Mtok$2.50$6.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved task$0.466Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 2.5 Flash better than Mistral Large 2407 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Gemini 2.5 Flash has the edge where output tokens cost 2.4x less, and where the context window is larger, 1.05M against 131K tokens.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash or Mistral Large 2407?

Gemini 2.5 Flash costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; Mistral Large 2407 costs $2.00 and $6.00. Cost per solved task is known for Gemini 2.5 Flash only.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 2.5 Flash or Mistral Large 2407?

Gemini 2.5 Flash, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Mistral Large 2407 comparison based on?

12 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Gemini 2.5 Flash's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Mistral Large 2407's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next