Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs GPT-3.5 Turbo

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp leads GPT-3.5 Turbo on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 16.6 to 5.5, and DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs 3.7x less per output token ($0.41 vs $1.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 5 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V3.2 ExpDeepSeek
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.41
5
GPT-3.5 TurboOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.50
0
vs boards won of 5 shared

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp or GPT-3.5 Turbo: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick DeepSeek V3.2 Exp for output tokens 3.7x cheaper ($0.41 vs $1.50 per million) and a larger context window (164K against 16K tokens).

Shared results
5
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp only
54
GPT-3.5 Turbo only
8
Like-for-like categories
4 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp not benchmarked, GPT-3.5 Turbo not benchmarked.
Widest category
Reasoning, 50.0 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run): DeepSeek V3.2 Exp 79.7% against GPT-3.5 Turbo 29.7%, 50.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp $0.41 against GPT-3.5 Turbo $1.50 per million output tokens, 3.7x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp takes 164K tokens, GPT-3.5 Turbo 16K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V3.2 ExpBarsGPT-3.5 TurboTies
Intelligence10
Reasoning10
Knowledge10
General20
All shared boards50
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index10 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and GPT-3.5 Turbo
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGPT-3.5 TurboLeader
Aider polyglot74.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena WebDev1272Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured10.7Only GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)78.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)31.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
WeirdML39.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: coding1438Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1438Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1281Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
SciCodeNot measured0.0%Only GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and GPT-3.5 Turbo
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGPT-3.5 TurboLeader
AA Intelligence Index16.65.5DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
Epoch Capabilities Index144.9Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and GPT-3.5 Turbo
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGPT-3.5 TurboLeader
τ²-Bench Telecom33.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
TheAgentCompany42.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)56.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and GPT-3.5 Turbo
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGPT-3.5 TurboLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured30.6%Only GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)79.7%29.7%DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)14.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
BIG-Bench HardNot measured61.6%Only GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1429Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: expert1422Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1444Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark52.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and GPT-3.5 Turbo
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGPT-3.5 TurboLeader
AA Math Index87.7Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)87.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
GSM8KNot measured57.8%Only GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: math1422Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1433Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and GPT-3.5 Turbo
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGPT-3.5 TurboLeader
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured64.4%Only GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured58.5%Only GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)85.0%46.2%DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
MMLUNot measured68.5%Only GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: science1443Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1468Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1419Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1412Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and GPT-3.5 Turbo
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGPT-3.5 TurboLeader
Design Arena: websites1178Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Design Arena: UI components1164Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Design Arena: game dev1144Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Design Arena: data viz1152Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Design Arena: 3D1148Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Design Arena: all code categories1170Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Design Arena: SVG1031Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and GPT-3.5 Turbo
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGPT-3.5 TurboLeader
IFBench54.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)72.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
DTBench87.7%48.5%DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMCA29.1%9.7%DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
Fiction.LiveBench83.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
CL-bench13.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
CL-bench Life9.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text1425Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1401Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1404Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: English1441Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: non-English1404Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1461Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: German1440Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1331Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: Korean1372Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: French1434Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1441Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: Russian1412Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: Polish1435Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1422Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1418Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1407Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1407Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and GPT-3.5 Turbo
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGPT-3.5 TurboLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp$0.0005Fits in one request
GPT-3.5 Turbo$0.0013Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp$0.015Fits in one request
GPT-3.5 Turbo$0.029Exceeds the context window

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp$0.058Exceeds the context window
GPT-3.5 Turbo$0.115Exceeds the context window

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and GPT-3.5 Turbo
SpecificationDeepSeek V3.2 ExpOpenAI GPT-3.5 Turbo
MakerDeepSeekOpenAI
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedSeptember 29, 2025May 28, 2023
Context window164K16K
Input $/Mtok$0.27$0.50
Output $/Mtok$0.41$1.50
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it10
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V3.2 Exp better than GPT-3.5 Turbo for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick DeepSeek V3.2 Exp for output tokens 3.7x cheaper ($0.41 vs $1.50 per million) and a larger context window (164K against 16K tokens).

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.2 Exp or GPT-3.5 Turbo?

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs $0.27 per million input tokens and $0.41 per million output tokens; GPT-3.5 Turbo costs $0.50 and $1.50. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V3.2 Exp or GPT-3.5 Turbo?

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp, with 164K tokens against 16K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs GPT-3.5 Turbo comparison based on?

5 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. DeepSeek V3.2 Exp's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and GPT-3.5 Turbo's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next