Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V3 0324 vs Hy3 preview

Hy3 preview leads DeepSeek V3 0324 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 25.3 to 9.7, and Hy3 preview costs 1.8x less per output token ($0.60 vs $1.07 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 9 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V3 0324DeepSeek
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.07
0
Hy3 previewTencent
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.60
9
vs boards won of 9 shared

DeepSeek V3 0324 or Hy3 preview: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick DeepSeek V3 0324 for work measured by AA Coding Index or Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Shared results
9
DeepSeek V3 0324 only
26
Hy3 preview only
27
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V3 0324 not benchmarked, Hy3 preview not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 34.5 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: DeepSeek V3 0324 47.1% against Hy3 preview 92.7%, 45.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V3 0324 $1.07 against Hy3 preview $0.60 per million output tokens, 1.8x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V3 0324 takes 164K tokens, Hy3 preview 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V3 0324BarsHy3 previewTies
Coding02
Intelligence01
Agentic work02
Reasoning02
General02
All shared boards09
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 0324 and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3 0324Hy3 previewLeader
SWE-bench Verified42.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1357Only Hy3 preview measured
AA Coding Index21.258.8Hy3 preview
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)65.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)40.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
SciCode39.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)15.2%34.1%Hy3 preview
WeirdML36.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1421Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1423Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1349Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1356Only Hy3 preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 0324 and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3 0324Hy3 previewLeader
AA Intelligence Index9.725.3Hy3 preview
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 0324 and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3 0324Hy3 previewLeader
AA Agentic Index0.824.1Hy3 preview
τ²-Bench Telecom47.1%92.7%Hy3 preview
METR time horizons49.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 0324 and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3 0324Hy3 previewLeader
GPQA Diamond61.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)65.5%86.7%Hy3 preview
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)4.7%27.8%Hy3 preview
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)67.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
SimpleBench27.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1413Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1422Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1416Only Hy3 preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 0324 and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3 0324Hy3 previewLeader
AIME52.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)88.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)91.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
AA Math Index41.0Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)41.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
OTIS Mock AIME37.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
MATH level 575.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1424Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1442Only Hy3 preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 0324 and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3 0324Hy3 previewLeader
MMLU Pro79.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)77.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)54.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)71.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)82.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)81.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1416Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1405Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1430Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1397Only Hy3 preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 0324 and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3 0324Hy3 previewLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 0324 and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3 0324Hy3 previewLeader
IFBench41.0%63.1%Hy3 preview
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)40.7%64.7%Hy3 preview
DTBench64.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
LMCA15.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
Fiction.LiveBench50.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)77.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1401Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1383Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1339Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1409Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1390Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1435Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1425Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1399Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1399Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1411Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1402Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1370Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1352Only Hy3 preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 0324 and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3 0324Hy3 previewLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V3 0324$0.0008Fits in one request
Hy3 preview$0.0005Fits in one request

Hy3 preview costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V3 0324$0.017Fits in one request
Hy3 preview$0.011Fits in one request

Hy3 preview costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V3 0324$0.065Exceeds the context window
Hy3 preview$0.042Fits in one request

Hy3 preview costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V3 0324 and Hy3 preview
SpecificationDeepSeek V3 0324Tencent Hy3 preview
MakerDeepSeekTencent
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedMarch 24, 2025April 22, 2026
Context window164K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.27$0.18
Output $/Mtok$1.07$0.60
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V3 0324 better than Hy3 preview for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick DeepSeek V3 0324 for work measured by AA Coding Index or Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3 0324 or Hy3 preview?

DeepSeek V3 0324 costs $0.27 per million input tokens and $1.07 per million output tokens; Hy3 preview costs $0.18 and $0.60. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V3 0324 or Hy3 preview?

Hy3 preview, with 262K tokens against 164K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V3 0324 vs Hy3 preview comparison based on?

9 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. DeepSeek V3 0324's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Hy3 preview's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next