LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V3 0324 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

Updated October 21, 2026. 4 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

DeepSeek V3 0324DeepSeek
Coding
42.0
Overall
9.7
Output $/M
$1.14
0
Nemotron 3.5 Super VLNVIDIA
Coding
65.5
Overall
26.5
Output $/M
$0.50
4
vs boards won of 4 shared

Decision reading

Pick Nemotron 3.5 Super VL for coding: it scores 65.5 on the Vibe Coding Index against 42.0 for DeepSeek V3 0324.

DeepSeek V3 0324 is neither cheaper nor larger in context, and leads no benchmark both models were measured on.

Shared results
4
DeepSeek V3 0324 only
31
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL only
12
Like-for-like categories
4 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V3 0324 42.0 from 1 benchmark, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 65.5 from 1 benchmark.
Widest category
General, 28.3 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): DeepSeek V3 0324 40.7% against Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 69.0%, 28.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V3 0324 $1.14 against Nemotron 3.5 Super VL $0.50 per million output tokens, 2.3x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V3 0324 takes 164K tokens, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V3 0324BarsNemotron 3.5 Super VLTies
Coding01
Intelligence01
Reasoning01
General01
All shared boards04
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index01
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 0324 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3 0324Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
SWE-bench Verified42.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
LiveBench codingNot measured65.5%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
AA Coding Index21.2Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)65.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)40.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
SciCode39.0%47.8%Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)15.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
WeirdML36.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 0324 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3 0324Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
AA Intelligence Index9.726.5Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 0324 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3 0324Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
AA Agentic Index0.8Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
LiveBench researchNot measured70.9%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
LiveBench browserNot measured4.0%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured15.8%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
τ²-Bench Telecom47.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
METR time horizons49.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 0324 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3 0324Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
GPQA Diamond61.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured78.8%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)65.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)4.7%30.7%Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)67.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
SimpleBench27.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 0324 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3 0324Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
AIME52.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)88.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)91.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
AA Math Index41.0Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)41.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
OTIS Mock AIME37.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
MATH level 575.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 0324 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3 0324Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
MMLU Pro79.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)77.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)54.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)71.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)82.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)81.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 0324 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3 0324Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1171Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1148Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1108Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1132Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1155Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
LiveBench designNot measured60.7%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 0324 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3 0324Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured64.6%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
IFBench41.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)40.7%69.0%Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
DTBench64.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
LMCA15.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
Fiction.LiveBench50.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)77.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 0324 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3 0324Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V3 0324$0.0009Fits in one request
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.0004Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V3 0324$0.018Fits in one request
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.0090Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V3 0324$0.069Exceeds the context window
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.035Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V3 0324 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
SpecificationDeepSeek V3 0324NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
MakerDeepSeekNVIDIA
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedMarch 24, 2025October 15, 2026
Context window164K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.29$0.15
Output $/Mtok$1.14$0.50
Coding index42.065.5
Independent measurements behind it11
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V3 0324 better than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL for coding?

Pick Nemotron 3.5 Super VL for coding: it scores 65.5 on the Vibe Coding Index against 42.0 for DeepSeek V3 0324. DeepSeek V3 0324 is neither cheaper nor larger in context, and leads no benchmark both models were measured on.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3 0324 or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

DeepSeek V3 0324 costs $0.29 per million input tokens and $1.14 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs $0.15 and $0.50. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V3 0324 or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL, with 1.05M tokens against 164K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V3 0324 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL comparison based on?

4 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. DeepSeek V3 0324's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next