Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V3 0324 vs MiniMax M2

MiniMax M2 leads DeepSeek V3 0324 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 18.6 to 9.7, at about the same output price ($1.02 vs $1.07 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 12 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V3 0324DeepSeek
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.07
0
MiniMax M2MiniMax
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.02
12
vs boards won of 12 shared

DeepSeek V3 0324 or MiniMax M2: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick DeepSeek V3 0324 for work measured by SWE-bench Verified or LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Shared results
12
DeepSeek V3 0324 only
24
MiniMax M2 only
38
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V3 0324 not benchmarked, MiniMax M2 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 39.8 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run): DeepSeek V3 0324 40.5% against MiniMax M2 82.6%, 42.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V3 0324 $1.07 against MiniMax M2 $1.02 per million output tokens, 1.0x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V3 0324 takes 164K tokens, MiniMax M2 205K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V3 0324BarsMiniMax M2Ties
Coding03
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning02
Math02
Knowledge01
General02
All shared boards012
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 0324 and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3 0324MiniMax M2Leader
SWE-bench Verified42.0%61.0%MiniMax M2
LMArena WebDevNot measured1297Only MiniMax M2 measured
AA Coding Index21.2Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)65.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)40.5%82.6%MiniMax M2
SciCode39.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)15.2%25.8%MiniMax M2
Terminal-BenchNot measured30.0%Only MiniMax M2 measured
WeirdML36.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1371Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1373Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1306Only MiniMax M2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 0324 and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3 0324MiniMax M2Leader
AA Intelligence Index9.718.6MiniMax M2
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 0324 and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3 0324MiniMax M2Leader
AA Agentic Index0.8Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom47.1%86.8%MiniMax M2
METR time horizons49.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$161Only MiniMax M2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 0324 and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3 0324MiniMax M2Leader
GPQA Diamond61.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)65.5%77.7%MiniMax M2
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)4.7%13.7%MiniMax M2
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)67.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
SimpleBench27.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1357Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1338Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1376Only MiniMax M2 measured
Kagi LLM BenchmarkNot measured57.8%Only MiniMax M2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 0324 and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3 0324MiniMax M2Leader
AIME52.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)88.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)91.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
AA Math Index41.078.3MiniMax M2
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)41.0%78.3%MiniMax M2
OTIS Mock AIME37.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
MATH level 575.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1351Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1368Only MiniMax M2 measured
MathArena7.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 0324 and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3 0324MiniMax M2Leader
MMLU Pro79.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)77.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)54.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)71.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)82.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)81.9%82.0%MiniMax M2
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1348Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1367Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1349Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1336Only MiniMax M2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 0324 and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3 0324MiniMax M2Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1143Only MiniMax M2 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1134Only MiniMax M2 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1118Only MiniMax M2 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1140Only MiniMax M2 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1098Only MiniMax M2 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1135Only MiniMax M2 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1100Only MiniMax M2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 0324 and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3 0324MiniMax M2Leader
IFBench41.0%72.3%MiniMax M2
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)40.7%64.3%MiniMax M2
DTBench64.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
LMCA15.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
Fiction.LiveBench50.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)77.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1340Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1329Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1286Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1364Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1313Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1366Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1357Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1336Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1326Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1330Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1312Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1361Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1331Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1295Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1298Only MiniMax M2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 0324 and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3 0324MiniMax M2Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V3 0324$0.0008Fits in one request
MiniMax M2$0.0008Fits in one request

MiniMax M2 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V3 0324$0.017Fits in one request
MiniMax M2$0.016Fits in one request

MiniMax M2 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V3 0324$0.065Exceeds the context window
MiniMax M2$0.061Exceeds the context window

MiniMax M2 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V3 0324 and MiniMax M2
SpecificationDeepSeek V3 0324MiniMax M2
MakerDeepSeekMiniMax
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedMarch 24, 2025October 23, 2025
Context window164K205K
Input $/Mtok$0.27$0.255
Output $/Mtok$1.07$1.02
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.702
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V3 0324 better than MiniMax M2 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick DeepSeek V3 0324 for work measured by SWE-bench Verified or LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3 0324 or MiniMax M2?

DeepSeek V3 0324 costs $0.27 per million input tokens and $1.07 per million output tokens; MiniMax M2 costs $0.255 and $1.02. Cost per solved task is known for MiniMax M2 only.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V3 0324 or MiniMax M2?

MiniMax M2, with 205K tokens against 164K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V3 0324 vs MiniMax M2 comparison based on?

12 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. DeepSeek V3 0324's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and MiniMax M2's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next