Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V3 0324 vs Granite 4.2 8B

Granite 4.2 8B leads DeepSeek V3 0324 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 11.1 to 9.7, and Granite 4.2 8B costs 5.3x less per output token ($0.20 vs $1.07 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 7 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V3 0324DeepSeek
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.07
2
Granite 4.2 8BIBM Granite
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.20
5
vs boards won of 7 shared

DeepSeek V3 0324 or Granite 4.2 8B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick DeepSeek V3 0324 for a larger context window (164K against 131K tokens) and work measured by AA Coding Index or AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Shared results
7
DeepSeek V3 0324 only
29
Granite 4.2 8B only
20
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V3 0324 not benchmarked, Granite 4.2 8B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Coding, 4.3 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
SciCode: DeepSeek V3 0324 39.0% against Granite 4.2 8B 31.5%, 7.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V3 0324 $1.07 against Granite 4.2 8B $0.20 per million output tokens, 5.3x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V3 0324 takes 164K tokens, Granite 4.2 8B 131K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V3 0324BarsGranite 4.2 8BTies
Coding11
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning11
General01
All shared boards25
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index11
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 0324 and Granite 4.2 8B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3 0324Granite 4.2 8BLeader
SWE-bench Verified42.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
AA Coding Index21.222.4Granite 4.2 8B
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)65.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)40.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
SciCode39.0%31.5%DeepSeek V3 0324
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)15.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
WeirdML36.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1378Only Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1367Only Granite 4.2 8B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 0324 and Granite 4.2 8B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3 0324Granite 4.2 8BLeader
AA Intelligence Index9.711.1Granite 4.2 8B
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 0324 and Granite 4.2 8B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3 0324Granite 4.2 8BLeader
AA Agentic Index0.81.3Granite 4.2 8B
τ²-Bench Telecom47.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
METR time horizons49.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 0324 and Granite 4.2 8B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3 0324Granite 4.2 8BLeader
GPQA Diamond61.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)65.5%63.1%DeepSeek V3 0324
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)4.7%9.7%Granite 4.2 8B
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)67.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
SimpleBench27.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1327Only Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1386Only Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1345Only Granite 4.2 8B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 0324 and Granite 4.2 8B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3 0324Granite 4.2 8BLeader
AIME52.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)88.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)91.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
AA Math Index41.0Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)41.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
OTIS Mock AIME37.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
MATH level 575.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
MathArena7.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 0324 and Granite 4.2 8B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3 0324Granite 4.2 8BLeader
MMLU Pro79.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)77.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)54.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)71.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)82.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)81.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1336Only Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1336Only Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1327Only Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1322Only Granite 4.2 8B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 0324 and Granite 4.2 8B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3 0324Granite 4.2 8BLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 0324 and Granite 4.2 8B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3 0324Granite 4.2 8BLeader
IFBench41.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)40.7%45.0%Granite 4.2 8B
DTBench64.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
LMCA15.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
Fiction.LiveBench50.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)77.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1319Only Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1300Only Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1236Only Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1337Only Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1301Only Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1367Only Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1282Only Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1301Only Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1325Only Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1269Only Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1271Only Granite 4.2 8B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 0324 and Granite 4.2 8B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3 0324Granite 4.2 8BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V3 0324$0.0008Fits in one request
Granite 4.2 8B$0.0002Fits in one request

Granite 4.2 8B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V3 0324$0.017Fits in one request
Granite 4.2 8B$0.0046Fits in one request

Granite 4.2 8B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V3 0324$0.065Exceeds the context window
Granite 4.2 8B$0.018Exceeds the context window

Granite 4.2 8B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V3 0324 and Granite 4.2 8B
SpecificationDeepSeek V3 0324IBM Granite 4.2 8B
MakerDeepSeekIBM Granite
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedMarch 24, 2025August 31, 2026
Context window164K131K
Input $/Mtok$0.27$0.08
Output $/Mtok$1.07$0.20
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V3 0324 better than Granite 4.2 8B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick DeepSeek V3 0324 for a larger context window (164K against 131K tokens) and work measured by AA Coding Index or AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3 0324 or Granite 4.2 8B?

DeepSeek V3 0324 costs $0.27 per million input tokens and $1.07 per million output tokens; Granite 4.2 8B costs $0.08 and $0.20. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V3 0324 or Granite 4.2 8B?

DeepSeek V3 0324, with 164K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V3 0324 vs Granite 4.2 8B comparison based on?

7 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. DeepSeek V3 0324's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Granite 4.2 8B's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next