LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V3 0324 vs GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)

Updated October 21, 2026. 6 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

DeepSeek V3 0324DeepSeek
Coding
42.0
Overall
9.7
Output $/M
$1.14
6
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)OpenAI
Coding
3.6
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.60
0
vs boards won of 6 shared

Decision reading

Pick DeepSeek V3 0324 for coding: it scores 42.0 on the Vibe Coding Index against 3.6 for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18).

Pick GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) when output tokens cost 1.9x less.

Shared results
6
DeepSeek V3 0324 only
29
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) only
40
Like-for-like categories
4 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V3 0324 42.0 from 1 benchmark, GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) 3.6 from 1 benchmark.
Widest category
Math, 26.9 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
OTIS Mock AIME: DeepSeek V3 0324 37.8% against GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) 6.9%, 30.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V3 0324 $1.14 against GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) $0.60 per million output tokens, 1.9x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V3 0324 takes 164K tokens, GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) 128K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V3 0324BarsGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Ties
Coding10
Reasoning20
Math20
General10
All shared boards60
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index10
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 0324 and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3 0324GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
Aider polyglotNot measured3.6%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
SWE-bench Verified42.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
AA Coding Index21.2Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)65.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)40.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
SciCode39.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)15.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
WeirdML36.1%11.8%DeepSeek V3 0324
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1290Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1291Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 0324 and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3 0324GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
AA Intelligence Index9.7Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 0324 and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3 0324GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
AA Agentic Index0.8Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom47.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
METR time horizons49.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
BALROGNot measured17.4%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 0324 and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3 0324GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
GPQA Diamond61.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)65.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)4.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)67.6%37.7%DeepSeek V3 0324
SimpleBench27.2%10.7%DeepSeek V3 0324
Chess puzzlesNot measured3.0%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured12.0%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
VPCTNot measured34.0%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1267Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1234Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1278Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 0324 and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3 0324GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
AIME52.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)88.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)91.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
AA Math Index41.0Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)41.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
OTIS Mock AIME37.8%6.9%DeepSeek V3 0324
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured0.7%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
MATH level 575.5%52.6%DeepSeek V3 0324
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1267Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1271Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 0324 and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3 0324GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
MMLU Pro79.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)77.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)54.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)71.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)82.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)81.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured8.3%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
MMLUNot measured76.7%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
GeoBenchNot measured64.0%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1286Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1282Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1305Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1265Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 0324 and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3 0324GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 0324 and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3 0324GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
IFBench41.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)40.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
DTBench64.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
LMCA15.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
Fiction.LiveBench50.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)77.0%67.2%DeepSeek V3 0324
LMArena TextNot measured1286Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1258Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1268Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1066Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1301Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1266Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1265Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1272Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1216Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1195Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1297Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1276Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1275Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1244Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1285Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1289Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1282Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1253Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1072Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1033Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 0324 and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3 0324GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V3 0324$0.0009Fits in one request
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)$0.0004Fits in one request

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V3 0324$0.018Fits in one request
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)$0.0093Fits in one request

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V3 0324$0.069Exceeds the context window
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)$0.036Exceeds the context window

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V3 0324 and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
SpecificationDeepSeek V3 0324OpenAI GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
MakerDeepSeekOpenAI
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedMarch 24, 2025July 18, 2024
Context window164K128K
Input $/Mtok$0.29$0.15
Output $/Mtok$1.14$0.60
Coding index42.03.6
Independent measurements behind it11
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V3 0324 better than GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) for coding?

Pick DeepSeek V3 0324 for coding: it scores 42.0 on the Vibe Coding Index against 3.6 for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18). Pick GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) when output tokens cost 1.9x less.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3 0324 or GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)?

DeepSeek V3 0324 costs $0.29 per million input tokens and $1.14 per million output tokens; GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) costs $0.15 and $0.60. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V3 0324 or GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)?

DeepSeek V3 0324, with 164K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V3 0324 vs GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) comparison based on?

6 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. DeepSeek V3 0324's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)'s on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next