Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V3 0324 vs GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k

DeepSeek V3 0324 costs 3.7x less per output token than GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k ($1.07 vs $4.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

DeepSeek V3 0324DeepSeek
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.07
GPT-3.5 Turbo 16kOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$4.00
vs $1.07 vs $4.00 per 1M output tokens. DeepSeek V3 0324 is 3.7x cheaper.

DeepSeek V3 0324 or GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick DeepSeek V3 0324 for output tokens 3.7x cheaper ($1.07 vs $4.00 per million) and a larger context window (164K against 16K tokens).

No benchmark has tested both yet. DeepSeek V3 0324 has results on SWE-bench Verified, AA Coding Index and LiveCodeBench (Vals AI); GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V3 0324 not benchmarked, GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
DeepSeek V3 0324 $1.07 against GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k $4.00 per million output tokens, 3.7x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V3 0324 takes 164K tokens, GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k 16K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index7 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 0324 and GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3 0324GPT-3.5 Turbo 16kLeader
SWE-bench Verified42.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
AA Coding Index21.2Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)65.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)40.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
SciCode39.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)15.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
WeirdML36.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 36 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 0324 and GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3 0324GPT-3.5 Turbo 16kLeader
AA Intelligence Index9.7Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 0324 and GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3 0324GPT-3.5 Turbo 16kLeader
AA Agentic Index0.8Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom47.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
METR time horizons49.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 0324 and GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3 0324GPT-3.5 Turbo 16kLeader
GPQA Diamond61.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)65.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)4.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)67.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
SimpleBench27.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards measured
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 0324 and GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3 0324GPT-3.5 Turbo 16kLeader
AIME52.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)88.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)91.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
AA Math Index41.0Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)41.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
OTIS Mock AIME37.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
MATH level 575.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
MathArena7.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 0324 and GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3 0324GPT-3.5 Turbo 16kLeader
MMLU Pro79.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)77.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)54.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)71.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)82.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)81.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards measured
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 0324 and GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3 0324GPT-3.5 Turbo 16kLeader
IFBench41.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)40.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
DTBench64.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
LMCA15.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
Fiction.LiveBench50.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)77.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 0324 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 42 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V3 0324$0.0008Fits in one request
GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k$0.0050Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3 0324 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V3 0324$0.017Fits in one request
GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k$0.162Exceeds the context window

DeepSeek V3 0324 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V3 0324$0.065Exceeds the context window
GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k$0.640Exceeds the context window

DeepSeek V3 0324 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V3 0324 and GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k
SpecificationDeepSeek V3 0324OpenAI GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k
MakerDeepSeekOpenAI
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedMarch 24, 2025August 28, 2023
Context window164K16K
Input $/Mtok$0.27$3.00
Output $/Mtok$1.07$4.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V3 0324 better than GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick DeepSeek V3 0324 for output tokens 3.7x cheaper ($1.07 vs $4.00 per million) and a larger context window (164K against 16K tokens).

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3 0324 or GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k?

DeepSeek V3 0324 costs $0.27 per million input tokens and $1.07 per million output tokens; GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k costs $3.00 and $4.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V3 0324 or GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k?

DeepSeek V3 0324, with 164K tokens against 16K.

Has any benchmark tested both DeepSeek V3 0324 and GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k?

No benchmark has tested both yet. DeepSeek V3 0324 has results on SWE-bench Verified, AA Coding Index and LiveCodeBench (Vals AI); GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next