UI-TARS 7B vs GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
UI-TARS 7B costs 50.0x less per output token than GPT-4o (2024-11-20) ($0.20 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.
- Coding
- No data
- Overall
- No data
- Output $/M
- $0.20
- Coding
- No data
- Overall
- No data
- Output $/M
- $10.00
UI-TARS 7B or GPT-4o (2024-11-20): which to pick
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick UI-TARS 7B for output tokens 50.0x cheaper ($0.20 vs $10.00 per million).
No benchmark has tested both yet. UI-TARS 7B has results on Kagi LLM Benchmark; GPT-4o (2024-11-20) on Aider polyglot, LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) and GSO-Bench. Compare them on price and context instead.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
No call
Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) has a AA Intelligence Index result, 8.4.
Directional only
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) has a GPQA Diamond result, 53.8%.
Directional only
Math
AIME
No call
Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) has a AIME result, 11.9%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) has a MMLU Pro result, 72.6%.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
No call
Both take 128K tokens.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
UI-TARS 7B
UI-TARS 7B $0.0002, GPT-4o (2024-11-20) $0.0075 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- UI-TARS 7B not benchmarked, GPT-4o (2024-11-20) not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
- Widest single gap
- None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
- Output price
- UI-TARS 7B $0.20 against GPT-4o (2024-11-20) $10.00 per million output tokens, 50.0x apart.
- Context window
- Both take 128K tokens.
Benchmark by benchmark
Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index5 boards measured
| Benchmark | UI-TARS 7B | GPT-4o (2024-11-20) | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aider polyglot | Not measured | 18.2% | Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 43.4% | Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured |
| GSO-Bench | Not measured | 0.0% | Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured |
| WeirdML | Not measured | 25.1% | Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured |
| Cybench | Not measured | 12.5% | Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here | |||
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
| Benchmark | UI-TARS 7B | GPT-4o (2024-11-20) | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | Not measured | 8.4 | Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
| Benchmark | UI-TARS 7B | GPT-4o (2024-11-20) | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | Not measured | 8.6% | Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 41 boards here | |||
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards measured
| Benchmark | UI-TARS 7B | GPT-4o (2024-11-20) | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | Not measured | 53.8% | Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | Not measured | 62.2% | Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | Not measured | 47.9% | Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured |
| VPCT | Not measured | 40.0% | Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 20.7% | Not measured | Only UI-TARS 7B measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here | |||
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards measured
| Benchmark | UI-TARS 7B | GPT-4o (2024-11-20) | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | Not measured | 11.9% | Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured |
| MATH 500 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 74.0% | Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured |
| MGSM (Vals AI) | Not measured | 90.4% | Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured |
| OTIS Mock AIME | Not measured | 6.3% | Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured |
| MATH level 5 | Not measured | 49.8% | Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here | |||
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards measured
| Benchmark | UI-TARS 7B | GPT-4o (2024-11-20) | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | Not measured | 72.6% | Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 82.2% | Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured |
| CaseLaw (Vals AI) | Not measured | 59.7% | Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | Not measured | 45.9% | Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | Not measured | 74.5% | Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | Not measured | 57.4% | Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured |
| GeoBench | Not measured | 71.0% | Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here | |||
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
| Benchmark | UI-TARS 7B | GPT-4o (2024-11-20) | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Creative writing (Lech Mazur) | Not measured | 81.8% | Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 47 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
UI-TARS 7B costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
UI-TARS 7B costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
UI-TARS 7B costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | ByteDance UI-TARS 7B | OpenAI GPT-4o (2024-11-20) |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | ByteDance | OpenAI |
| Weights | Open weights | No public weights listed |
| Released | July 22, 2025 | November 20, 2024 |
| Context window | 128K | 128K |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.10 | $2.50 |
| Output $/Mtok | $0.20 | $10.00 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is UI-TARS 7B better than GPT-4o (2024-11-20) for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick UI-TARS 7B for output tokens 50.0x cheaper ($0.20 vs $10.00 per million).
Which is cheaper, UI-TARS 7B or GPT-4o (2024-11-20)?
UI-TARS 7B costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens; GPT-4o (2024-11-20) costs $2.50 and $10.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, UI-TARS 7B or GPT-4o (2024-11-20)?
Neither: both take 128K tokens.
Has any benchmark tested both UI-TARS 7B and GPT-4o (2024-11-20)?
No benchmark has tested both yet. UI-TARS 7B has results on Kagi LLM Benchmark; GPT-4o (2024-11-20) on Aider polyglot, LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) and GSO-Bench. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 23, 2026.