Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Trinity Large Thinking vs Mistral Large 3 2512

Trinity Large Thinking leads Mistral Large 3 2512 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 10.8 to 9.3, and Trinity Large Thinking costs 1.9x less per output token ($0.80 vs $1.50 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 13 benchmarks have a result for both.

Trinity Large ThinkingArcee AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.80
3
Mistral Large 3 2512Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.50
9
vs boards won of 13 shared, 1 tied

Trinity Large Thinking or Mistral Large 3 2512: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Trinity Large Thinking for output tokens 1.9x cheaper ($0.80 vs $1.50 per million) and work measured by CaseLaw (Vals AI) or CorpFin (Vals AI), where it leads.

Shared results
13
Trinity Large Thinking only
39
Mistral Large 3 2512 only
15
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Trinity Large Thinking not benchmarked, Mistral Large 3 2512 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Coding, 5.7 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: UI components: Trinity Large Thinking 1045 against Mistral Large 3 2512 1102, 7.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Trinity Large Thinking $0.80 against Mistral Large 3 2512 $1.50 per million output tokens, 1.9x apart.
Context window
Both take 262K tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryTrinity Large ThinkingBarsMistral Large 3 2512Ties
Coding10
Intelligence10
Agentic work001 tie
Knowledge02
Web design17
All shared boards391 tie
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index10
Coding benchmarks for Trinity Large Thinking and Mistral Large 3 2512
BenchmarkTrinity Large ThinkingMistral Large 3 2512Leader
LMArena WebDev1238Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
AA Coding Index25.820.1Trinity Large Thinking
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured55.3%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured41.4%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
SciCode40.6%Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)22.7%Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
ALE-BenchNot measured264.7Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
LMArena Text: coding1357Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1362Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
LMArena WebDev: React1231Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1240Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Trinity Large Thinking and Mistral Large 3 2512
BenchmarkTrinity Large ThinkingMistral Large 3 2512Leader
AA Intelligence Index10.89.3Trinity Large Thinking
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index00
Agentic work benchmarks for Trinity Large Thinking and Mistral Large 3 2512
BenchmarkTrinity Large ThinkingMistral Large 3 2512Leader
AA Agentic Index1.01.0Tie
τ²-Bench Telecom90.1%Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Trinity Large Thinking and Mistral Large 3 2512
BenchmarkTrinity Large ThinkingMistral Large 3 2512Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured68.4%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured66.2%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)75.2%Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)15.8%Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1342Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
LMArena Text: expert1359Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1356Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Trinity Large Thinking and Mistral Large 3 2512
BenchmarkTrinity Large ThinkingMistral Large 3 2512Leader
AIMENot measured42.9%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured85.4%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
LMArena Text: math1365Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1350Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Knowledge benchmarks for Trinity Large Thinking and Mistral Large 3 2512
BenchmarkTrinity Large ThinkingMistral Large 3 2512Leader
MMLU ProNot measured79.8%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured79.1%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)57.9%61.4%Mistral Large 3 2512
CorpFin (Vals AI)54.7%61.0%Mistral Large 3 2512
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured73.1%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured52.1%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured82.2%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
LMArena Text: science1355Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1349Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1345Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1329Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index17
Web design benchmarks for Trinity Large Thinking and Mistral Large 3 2512
BenchmarkTrinity Large ThinkingMistral Large 3 2512Leader
Design Arena: websites11371162Mistral Large 3 2512
Design Arena: UI components10451102Mistral Large 3 2512
Design Arena: game dev10791080Mistral Large 3 2512
Design Arena: data viz10981136Mistral Large 3 2512
Design Arena: 3D10821100Mistral Large 3 2512
Design Arena: all code categories11171142Mistral Large 3 2512
Design Arena: SVG1017993Trinity Large Thinking
Design Arena: ASCII art10411069Mistral Large 3 2512
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index23 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Trinity Large Thinking and Mistral Large 3 2512
BenchmarkTrinity Large ThinkingMistral Large 3 2512Leader
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured24.6%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
IFBench56.3%Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)38.0%Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
DTBenchNot measured65.1%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
LMCANot measured16.7%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
Surface Evolver Bench15.6%Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
LMArena Text1340Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1326Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1308Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
LMArena Text: English1356Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
LMArena Text: non-English1325Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1371Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
LMArena Text: German1356Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1312Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
LMArena Text: Korean1306Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
LMArena Text: French1366Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1327Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
LMArena Text: Russian1338Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
LMArena Text: Polish1312Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1320Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1318Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1317Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1296Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Trinity Large Thinking and Mistral Large 3 2512
BenchmarkTrinity Large ThinkingMistral Large 3 2512Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Trinity Large Thinking$0.0006Fits in one request
Mistral Large 3 2512$0.0013Fits in one request

Trinity Large Thinking costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Trinity Large Thinking$0.015Fits in one request
Mistral Large 3 2512$0.029Fits in one request

Trinity Large Thinking costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Trinity Large Thinking$0.058Fits in one request
Mistral Large 3 2512$0.115Fits in one request

Trinity Large Thinking costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Trinity Large Thinking and Mistral Large 3 2512
SpecificationArcee AI Trinity Large ThinkingMistral Large 3 2512
MakerArcee AIMistral AI
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedApril 1, 2026December 1, 2025
Context window262K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.25$0.50
Output $/Mtok$0.80$1.50
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it11
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.77
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Trinity Large Thinking better than Mistral Large 3 2512 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Trinity Large Thinking for output tokens 1.9x cheaper ($0.80 vs $1.50 per million) and work measured by CaseLaw (Vals AI) or CorpFin (Vals AI), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Trinity Large Thinking or Mistral Large 3 2512?

Trinity Large Thinking costs $0.25 per million input tokens and $0.80 per million output tokens; Mistral Large 3 2512 costs $0.50 and $1.50. Cost per solved task is known for Mistral Large 3 2512 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Trinity Large Thinking or Mistral Large 3 2512?

Neither: both take 262K tokens.

How many benchmarks is the Trinity Large Thinking vs Mistral Large 3 2512 comparison based on?

13 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Trinity Large Thinking's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Mistral Large 3 2512's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next