Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Nova Pro 1.0 vs Mistral Medium 3.1

Mistral Medium 3.1 leads Nova Pro 1.0 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 9.2 to 7.0, and Mistral Medium 3.1 costs 1.6x less per output token ($2.00 vs $3.20 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 41 benchmarks have a result for both.

Replace Nova Pro 1.0 Replace Mistral Medium 3.1
Nova Pro 1.0Amazon
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$3.20
1
Mistral Medium 3.1Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.00
40
vs boards won of 41 shared

Nova Pro 1.0 or Mistral Medium 3.1: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Nova Pro 1.0 for a larger context window (300K against 131K tokens) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Model ANova Pro 1.0AmazonNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved taskModel BMistral Medium 3.1Mistral AINot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved task
Shared results
41
Nova Pro 1.0 only
1
Mistral Medium 3.1 only
33
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Nova Pro 1.0 not benchmarked, Mistral Medium 3.1 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Web design, 42.1 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: websites: Nova Pro 1.0 796 against Mistral Medium 3.1 1133, 42.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Nova Pro 1.0 $3.20 against Mistral Medium 3.1 $2.00 per million output tokens, 1.6x apart.
Context window
Nova Pro 1.0 takes 300K tokens, Mistral Medium 3.1 131K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryNova Pro 1.0BarsMistral Medium 3.1Ties
Coding04
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning05
Math04
Knowledge14
Web design01
General020
All shared boards140
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index04
Coding benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Mistral Medium 3.1
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Mistral Medium 3.1Leader
AA Coding IndexNot measured20.5Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured44.8%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)23.3%40.6%Mistral Medium 3.1
SciCodeNot measured32.4%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)6.1%10.6%Mistral Medium 3.1
ALE-BenchNot measured210.2Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: coding12701433Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: software and IT12711436Mistral Medium 3.1
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Mistral Medium 3.1
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Mistral Medium 3.1Leader
AA Intelligence Index7.09.2Mistral Medium 3.1
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Mistral Medium 3.1
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Mistral Medium 3.1Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured1.9Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom14.0%40.6%Mistral Medium 3.1
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Mistral Medium 3.1
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Mistral Medium 3.1Leader
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured63.0%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)49.9%58.8%Mistral Medium 3.1
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)3.2%4.7%Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: hard prompts12461426Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: expert12111408Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English12591435Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1175Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1165Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Math benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Mistral Medium 3.1
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Mistral Medium 3.1Leader
AIMENot measured42.3%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)Not measured87.0%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured90.9%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
AA Math Index7.038.3Mistral Medium 3.1
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)7.0%38.3%Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: math12521408Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: mathematical work12611412Mistral Medium 3.1
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index14
Knowledge benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Mistral Medium 3.1
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Mistral Medium 3.1Leader
MMLU ProNot measured75.3%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured62.0%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured50.7%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured70.3%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured36.5%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured78.2%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)69.1%68.3%Nova Pro 1.0
MMLU82.0%Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: science12551444Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare12601449Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: legal and government12811439Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: business and finance12291418Mistral Medium 3.1
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Web design benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Mistral Medium 3.1
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Mistral Medium 3.1Leader
Design Arena: websites7961133Mistral Medium 3.1
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1100Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1074Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1144Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1081Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1120Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured993Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured997Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index020
General benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Mistral Medium 3.1
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Mistral Medium 3.1Leader
IFBench38.1%39.8%Mistral Medium 3.1
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)21.0%42.7%Mistral Medium 3.1
DTBenchNot measured67.5%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMCANot measured19.1%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text12591424Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: instruction following12351398Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: creative writing12121391Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Vision9801172Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: English12761438Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: non-English12331408Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: Chinese12441447Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: German12431432Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: Japanese12001379Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: Korean12031380Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: French12711460Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: Spanish11821433Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: Russian12401411Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1430Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn12461418Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: longer queries12551406Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: writing and language12471395Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12101390Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Vision: English9871179Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1190Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1175Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1168Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1145Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1147Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1200Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Mistral Medium 3.1
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Mistral Medium 3.1Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Nova Pro 1.0$0.0024Fits in one request
Mistral Medium 3.1$0.0014Fits in one request

Mistral Medium 3.1 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Nova Pro 1.0$0.050Fits in one request
Mistral Medium 3.1$0.026Fits in one request

Mistral Medium 3.1 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Nova Pro 1.0$0.192Fits in one request
Mistral Medium 3.1$0.100Exceeds the context window

Mistral Medium 3.1 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Nova Pro 1.0 and Mistral Medium 3.1
SpecificationAmazon Nova Pro 1.0Mistral Medium 3.1
MakerAmazonMistral AI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedDecember 5, 2024August 13, 2025
Context window300K131K
Input $/Mtok$0.80$0.40
Output $/Mtok$3.20$2.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Nova Pro 1.0 better than Mistral Medium 3.1 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Nova Pro 1.0 for a larger context window (300K against 131K tokens) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Nova Pro 1.0 or Mistral Medium 3.1?

Nova Pro 1.0 costs $0.80 per million input tokens and $3.20 per million output tokens; Mistral Medium 3.1 costs $0.40 and $2.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Nova Pro 1.0 or Mistral Medium 3.1?

Nova Pro 1.0, with 300K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Nova Pro 1.0 vs Mistral Medium 3.1 comparison based on?

41 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Nova Pro 1.0's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Mistral Medium 3.1's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next