Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Nova Premier 1.0 vs GPT-4 Turbo

Nova Premier 1.0 leads GPT-4 Turbo on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 9.2 to 7.0, and Nova Premier 1.0 costs 2.4x less per output token ($12.50 vs $30.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 4 benchmarks have a result for both.

Nova Premier 1.0Amazon
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$12.50
4
GPT-4 TurboOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$30.00
0
vs boards won of 4 shared

Nova Premier 1.0 or GPT-4 Turbo: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Nova Premier 1.0 for output tokens 2.4x cheaper ($12.50 vs $30.00 per million) and a larger context window (1M against 128K tokens).

Shared results
4
Nova Premier 1.0 only
10
GPT-4 Turbo only
38
Like-for-like categories
4 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Nova Premier 1.0 not benchmarked, GPT-4 Turbo not benchmarked.
Widest category
Knowledge, 3.9 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run): Nova Premier 1.0 73.3% against GPT-4 Turbo 69.4%, 3.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Nova Premier 1.0 $12.50 against GPT-4 Turbo $30.00 per million output tokens, 2.4x apart.
Context window
Nova Premier 1.0 takes 1M tokens, GPT-4 Turbo 128K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryNova Premier 1.0BarsGPT-4 TurboTies
Coding10
Intelligence10
Reasoning10
Knowledge10
All shared boards40
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index10
Coding benchmarks for Nova Premier 1.0 and GPT-4 Turbo
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0GPT-4 TurboLeader
AA Coding IndexNot measured21.5Only GPT-4 Turbo measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)31.7%29.1%Nova Premier 1.0
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)6.8%Not measuredOnly Nova Premier 1.0 measured
ALE-Bench147.4Not measuredOnly Nova Premier 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1268Only GPT-4 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1267Only GPT-4 Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Nova Premier 1.0 and GPT-4 Turbo
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0GPT-4 TurboLeader
AA Intelligence Index9.27.0Nova Premier 1.0
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured127.3Only GPT-4 Turbo measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Nova Premier 1.0 and GPT-4 Turbo
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0GPT-4 TurboLeader
τ²-Bench Telecom38.3%Not measuredOnly Nova Premier 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Reasoning benchmarks for Nova Premier 1.0 and GPT-4 Turbo
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0GPT-4 TurboLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)56.9%Not measuredOnly Nova Premier 1.0 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)4.2%3.1%Nova Premier 1.0
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1251Only GPT-4 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1223Only GPT-4 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1266Only GPT-4 Turbo measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark44.8%Not measuredOnly Nova Premier 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Nova Premier 1.0 and GPT-4 Turbo
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0GPT-4 TurboLeader
AA Math Index17.3Not measuredOnly Nova Premier 1.0 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)17.3%Not measuredOnly Nova Premier 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1272Only GPT-4 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1268Only GPT-4 Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Knowledge benchmarks for Nova Premier 1.0 and GPT-4 Turbo
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0GPT-4 TurboLeader
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured80.5%Only GPT-4 Turbo measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured82.0%Only GPT-4 Turbo measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)73.3%69.4%Nova Premier 1.0
MMLUNot measured81.3%Only GPT-4 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1256Only GPT-4 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1239Only GPT-4 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1265Only GPT-4 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1222Only GPT-4 Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Nova Premier 1.0 and GPT-4 Turbo
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0GPT-4 TurboLeader
Design Arena: websites835Not measuredOnly Nova Premier 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index24 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Nova Premier 1.0 and GPT-4 Turbo
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0GPT-4 TurboLeader
IFBench36.2%Not measuredOnly Nova Premier 1.0 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)34.3%Not measuredOnly Nova Premier 1.0 measured
DTBenchNot measured61.6%Only GPT-4 Turbo measured
LMCANot measured9.8%Only GPT-4 Turbo measured
LMArena TextNot measured1272Only GPT-4 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1249Only GPT-4 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1268Only GPT-4 Turbo measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1090Only GPT-4 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1291Only GPT-4 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1245Only GPT-4 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1242Only GPT-4 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1259Only GPT-4 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1194Only GPT-4 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1187Only GPT-4 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1276Only GPT-4 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1260Only GPT-4 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1259Only GPT-4 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1302Only GPT-4 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1267Only GPT-4 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1254Only GPT-4 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1279Only GPT-4 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1258Only GPT-4 Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1097Only GPT-4 Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1045Only GPT-4 Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Nova Premier 1.0 and GPT-4 Turbo
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0GPT-4 TurboLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Nova Premier 1.0$0.0088Fits in one request
GPT-4 Turbo$0.025Fits in one request

Nova Premier 1.0 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Nova Premier 1.0$0.163Fits in one request
GPT-4 Turbo$0.590Fits in one request

Nova Premier 1.0 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Nova Premier 1.0$0.625Fits in one request
GPT-4 Turbo$2.30Exceeds the context window

Nova Premier 1.0 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Nova Premier 1.0 and GPT-4 Turbo
SpecificationAmazon Nova Premier 1.0OpenAI GPT-4 Turbo
MakerAmazonOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedOctober 31, 2025April 9, 2024
Context window1M128K
Input $/Mtok$2.50$10.00
Output $/Mtok$12.50$30.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Nova Premier 1.0 better than GPT-4 Turbo for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Nova Premier 1.0 for output tokens 2.4x cheaper ($12.50 vs $30.00 per million) and a larger context window (1M against 128K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Nova Premier 1.0 or GPT-4 Turbo?

Nova Premier 1.0 costs $2.50 per million input tokens and $12.50 per million output tokens; GPT-4 Turbo costs $10.00 and $30.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Nova Premier 1.0 or GPT-4 Turbo?

Nova Premier 1.0, with 1M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the Nova Premier 1.0 vs GPT-4 Turbo comparison based on?

4 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Nova Premier 1.0's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and GPT-4 Turbo's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next