Nova Micro 1.0 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash
Updated October 21, 2026. 38 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.
Decision reading
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Nova Micro 1.0 has the edge where output tokens cost 17.9x less, and where what matters is LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.
- Shared results
- 38
- Nova Micro 1.0 only
- 1
- Gemini 2.5 Flash only
- 31
- Like-for-like categories
- 7 of 9
Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash leads, 15.5 against 5.9.
Same board, both measured
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only Gemini 2.5 Flash has a Design Arena: websites result, 1074.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash takes 1.05M tokens against 128K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Nova Micro 1.0
Nova Micro 1.0 $0.0001, Gemini 2.5 Flash $0.0015 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only Gemini 2.5 Flash has the number, $0.466.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- Nova Micro 1.0 not benchmarked, Gemini 2.5 Flash not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- Math, 50.9 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run): Nova Micro 1.0 6.0% against Gemini 2.5 Flash 73.3%, 67.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Nova Micro 1.0 $0.14 against Gemini 2.5 Flash $2.50 per million output tokens, 17.9x apart.
- Context window
- Nova Micro 1.0 takes 128K tokens, Gemini 2.5 Flash 1.05M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Nova Micro 1.0 | Bars | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 0 | 4 | ||
| Intelligence | 0 | 1 | ||
| Agentic work | 0 | 1 | ||
| Reasoning | 0 | 5 | ||
| Math | 0 | 4 | ||
| Knowledge | 0 | 5 | ||
| General | 0 | 18 | ||
| All shared boards | 0 | 38 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index04
| Benchmark | Nova Micro 1.0 | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | Not measured | 28.7% | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | 14.0% | 69.5% | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 1.5% | 13.6% | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| Terminal-Bench | Not measured | 17.1% | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1218 | 1423 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1215 | 1425 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | Nova Micro 1.0 | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 5.9 | 15.5 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | Not measured | 142.9 | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | Nova Micro 1.0 | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 14.0% | 31.6% | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| BALROG | Not measured | 33.5% | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | Not measured | $549 | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 36 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
| Benchmark | Nova Micro 1.0 | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 35.8% | 79.0% | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 4.6% | 12.1% | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| ARC-AGI | Not measured | 33.3% | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| ARC-AGI-2 | Not measured | 2.5% | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| SimpleBench | Not measured | 41.2% | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1191 | 1422 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1183 | 1426 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1203 | 1420 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | Not measured | 1245 | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | Not measured | 1244 | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
| Benchmark | Nova Micro 1.0 | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Math Index | 6.0 | 73.3 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run) | 6.0% | 73.3% | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: math | 1206 | 1411 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1212 | 1422 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
| Benchmark | Nova Micro 1.0 | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MedCode (Vals AI) | Not measured | 40.4% | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | 53.1% | 83.2% | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| MMLU | 70.8% | Not measured | Only Nova Micro 1.0 measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1210 | 1433 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1207 | 1428 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1221 | 1430 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1182 | 1404 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Nova Micro 1.0 | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | Not measured | 1074 | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | Not measured | 1005 | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | Not measured | 1005 | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | Not measured | 1060 | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | Not measured | 1021 | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | Not measured | 1059 | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| Design Arena: SVG | Not measured | 1020 | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index018
| Benchmark | Nova Micro 1.0 | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAGE (Vals AI) | Not measured | 44.8% | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | Not measured | 83.0% | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| IFBench | 29.4% | 50.3% | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 13.0% | 65.3% | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| DTBench | Not measured | 76.5% | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| LMCA | Not measured | 27.5% | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text | 1208 | 1417 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1174 | 1405 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1172 | 1400 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| LMArena Vision | Not measured | 1235 | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1224 | 1418 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1186 | 1409 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1209 | 1449 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: German | 1192 | 1417 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1154 | 1396 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1150 | 1385 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: French | 1238 | 1432 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1225 | 1422 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1185 | 1415 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: Polish | Not measured | 1413 | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1178 | 1408 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1205 | 1419 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1192 | 1405 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1163 | 1393 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| LMArena Vision: English | Not measured | 1239 | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | Not measured | 1284 | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | Not measured | 1237 | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| LMArena Vision: humor | Not measured | 1225 | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| LMArena Vision: captioning | Not measured | 1277 | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| LMArena Vision: recognizing things | Not measured | 1252 | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | Not measured | 1241 | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Nova Micro 1.0 | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Nova Micro 1.0 costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Nova Micro 1.0 costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Nova Micro 1.0 costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Amazon Nova Micro 1.0 | Google Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Amazon | |
| Weights | No public weights listed | No public weights listed |
| Released | December 5, 2024 | June 17, 2025 |
| Context window | 128K | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.035 | $0.30 |
| Output $/Mtok | $0.14 | $2.50 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | $0.466 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Nova Micro 1.0 better than Gemini 2.5 Flash for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Nova Micro 1.0 has the edge where output tokens cost 17.9x less, and where what matters is LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.
Which is cheaper, Nova Micro 1.0 or Gemini 2.5 Flash?
Nova Micro 1.0 costs $0.035 per million input tokens and $0.14 per million output tokens; Gemini 2.5 Flash costs $0.30 and $2.50. Cost per solved task is known for Gemini 2.5 Flash only.
Which has the bigger context window, Nova Micro 1.0 or Gemini 2.5 Flash?
Gemini 2.5 Flash, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks is the Nova Micro 1.0 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash comparison based on?
38 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Nova Micro 1.0's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Gemini 2.5 Flash's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.