Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Nova 2 Lite vs GPT-4o (2024-11-20)

Nova 2 Lite leads GPT-4o (2024-11-20) on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 13.4 to 8.4, and Nova 2 Lite costs 4.0x less per output token ($2.50 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 1 benchmarks have a result for both.

Nova 2 LiteAmazon
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.50
1
GPT-4o (2024-11-20)OpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$10.00
0
vs boards won of 1 shared

Nova 2 Lite or GPT-4o (2024-11-20): which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Nova 2 Lite for output tokens 4.0x cheaper ($2.50 vs $10.00 per million) and a larger context window (1M against 128K tokens).

Shared results
1
Nova 2 Lite only
30
GPT-4o (2024-11-20) only
23
Like-for-like categories
1 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Nova 2 Lite not benchmarked, GPT-4o (2024-11-20) not benchmarked.
Widest category
Intelligence, 5.0 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AA Intelligence Index: Nova 2 Lite 13.4 against GPT-4o (2024-11-20) 8.4, 5.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Nova 2 Lite $2.50 against GPT-4o (2024-11-20) $10.00 per million output tokens, 4.0x apart.
Context window
Nova 2 Lite takes 1M tokens, GPT-4o (2024-11-20) 128K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryNova 2 LiteBarsGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Ties
Intelligence10
All shared boards10
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index9 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Leader
Aider polyglotNot measured18.2%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
AA Coding Index23.0Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured43.4%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
GSO-BenchNot measured0.0%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
WeirdMLNot measured25.1%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
CybenchNot measured12.5%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
ALE-Bench236.3Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: coding1385Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1394Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Leader
AA Intelligence Index13.48.4Nova 2 Lite
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Leader
TheAgentCompanyNot measured8.6%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 41 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured53.8%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured62.2%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured47.9%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
VPCTNot measured40.0%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1364Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: expert1359Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1385Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Leader
AIMENot measured11.9%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)Not measured74.0%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured90.4%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured6.3%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
MATH level 5Not measured49.8%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
LMArena Text: math1359Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1369Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Leader
MMLU ProNot measured72.6%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured82.2%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured59.7%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured45.9%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured74.5%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured57.4%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
GeoBenchNot measured71.0%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
LMArena Text: science1382Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1386Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1359Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1369Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Leader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index18 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Leader
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured81.8%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
LMArena Text1362Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1335Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1292Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: English1385Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: non-English1337Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1364Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: German1343Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1273Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: Korean1281Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: French1381Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1375Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: Russian1342Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: Polish1327Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1338Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1335Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1318Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1309Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Nova 2 Lite$0.0015Fits in one request
GPT-4o (2024-11-20)$0.0075Fits in one request

Nova 2 Lite costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Nova 2 Lite$0.022Fits in one request
GPT-4o (2024-11-20)$0.155Fits in one request

Nova 2 Lite costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Nova 2 Lite$0.085Fits in one request
GPT-4o (2024-11-20)$0.600Exceeds the context window

Nova 2 Lite costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Nova 2 Lite and GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
SpecificationAmazon Nova 2 LiteOpenAI GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
MakerAmazonOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedDecember 2, 2025November 20, 2024
Context window1M128K
Input $/Mtok$0.30$2.50
Output $/Mtok$2.50$10.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Nova 2 Lite better than GPT-4o (2024-11-20) for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Nova 2 Lite for output tokens 4.0x cheaper ($2.50 vs $10.00 per million) and a larger context window (1M against 128K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Nova 2 Lite or GPT-4o (2024-11-20)?

Nova 2 Lite costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; GPT-4o (2024-11-20) costs $2.50 and $10.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Nova 2 Lite or GPT-4o (2024-11-20)?

Nova 2 Lite, with 1M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the Nova 2 Lite vs GPT-4o (2024-11-20) comparison based on?

1 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Nova 2 Lite's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and GPT-4o (2024-11-20)'s on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next