Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Pareto 26.10 Preview vs Solar Mini 4

Solar Mini 4 costs 16.0x less per output token than Pareto 26.10 Preview ($0.20 vs $3.20 per million). Updated November 14, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

U Pareto 26.10 PreviewUnbiased
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$3.20
Solar Mini 4Upstage
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.20
vs $3.20 vs $0.20 per 1M output tokens. Solar Mini 4 is 16.0x cheaper.

Pareto 26.10 Preview or Solar Mini 4: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Pareto 26.10 Preview for a larger context window (1.05M against 524K tokens).

No benchmark has tested both yet. Pareto 26.10 Preview has results on GameBench 2; Solar Mini 4 on SciCode, Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Artificial Analysis run) and Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run). Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Pareto 26.10 Preview not benchmarked, Solar Mini 4 not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Pareto 26.10 Preview $3.20 against Solar Mini 4 $0.20 per million output tokens, 16.0x apart.
Context window
Pareto 26.10 Preview takes 1.05M tokens, Solar Mini 4 524K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index3 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Pareto 26.10 Preview and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkPareto 26.10 PreviewSolar Mini 4Leader
SciCodeNot measured47.6%Only Solar Mini 4 measured
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured1.0%Only Solar Mini 4 measured
GameBench 288.3Not measuredOnly Pareto 26.10 Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 49 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Pareto 26.10 Preview and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkPareto 26.10 PreviewSolar Mini 4Leader
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured25.8%Only Solar Mini 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Pareto 26.10 Preview and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkPareto 26.10 PreviewSolar Mini 4Leader
AA-OmniscienceNot measured-11.6Only Solar Mini 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for Pareto 26.10 Preview and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkPareto 26.10 PreviewSolar Mini 4Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1144Only Solar Mini 4 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1087Only Solar Mini 4 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1097Only Solar Mini 4 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1135Only Solar Mini 4 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1084Only Solar Mini 4 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1127Only Solar Mini 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
General benchmarks for Pareto 26.10 Preview and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkPareto 26.10 PreviewSolar Mini 4Leader
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured83.3%Only Solar Mini 4 measured
GDPval-AANot measured1092Only Solar Mini 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 47 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Pareto 26.10 Preview$0.0024Fits in one request
Solar Mini 4$0.0001Fits in one request

Solar Mini 4 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Pareto 26.10 Preview$0.050Fits in one request
Solar Mini 4$0.0031Fits in one request

Solar Mini 4 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Pareto 26.10 Preview$0.192Fits in one request
Solar Mini 4$0.012Fits in one request

Solar Mini 4 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Pareto 26.10 Preview and Solar Mini 4
SpecificationPareto 26.10 PreviewUpstage Solar Mini 4
MakerUnbiasedUpstage
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedOctober 1, 2026September 23, 2026
Context window1.05M524K
Input $/Mtok$0.80$0.05
Output $/Mtok$3.20$0.20
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Pareto 26.10 Preview better than Solar Mini 4 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Pareto 26.10 Preview for a larger context window (1.05M against 524K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Pareto 26.10 Preview or Solar Mini 4?

Pareto 26.10 Preview costs $0.80 per million input tokens and $3.20 per million output tokens; Solar Mini 4 costs $0.05 and $0.20. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Pareto 26.10 Preview or Solar Mini 4?

Pareto 26.10 Preview, with 1.05M tokens against 524K.

Has any benchmark tested both Pareto 26.10 Preview and Solar Mini 4?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Pareto 26.10 Preview has results on GameBench 2; Solar Mini 4 on SciCode, Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Artificial Analysis run) and Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run). Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of November 14, 2026.

Compare next