Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Hy3 preview vs Pareto 26.10 Preview

Hy3 preview costs 5.3x less per output token than Pareto 26.10 Preview ($0.60 vs $3.20 per million). Updated November 14, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Hy3 previewTencent
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.60
U Pareto 26.10 PreviewUnbiased
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$3.20
vs $0.60 vs $3.20 per 1M output tokens. Hy3 preview is 5.3x cheaper.

Hy3 preview or Pareto 26.10 Preview: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Hy3 preview for output tokens 5.3x cheaper ($0.60 vs $3.20 per million).

No benchmark has tested both yet. Hy3 preview has results on LMArena WebDev, AA Coding Index and Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run); Pareto 26.10 Preview on GameBench 2. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Hy3 preview not benchmarked, Pareto 26.10 Preview not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Hy3 preview $0.60 against Pareto 26.10 Preview $3.20 per million output tokens, 5.3x apart.
Context window
Hy3 preview takes 262K tokens, Pareto 26.10 Preview 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index8 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Hy3 preview and Pareto 26.10 Preview
BenchmarkHy3 previewPareto 26.10 PreviewLeader
LMArena WebDev1358Not measuredOnly Hy3 preview measured
AA Coding Index58.8Not measuredOnly Hy3 preview measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)34.1%Not measuredOnly Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: coding1421Not measuredOnly Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1423Not measuredOnly Hy3 preview measured
LMArena WebDev: React1350Not measuredOnly Hy3 preview measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1355Not measuredOnly Hy3 preview measured
GameBench 2Not measured88.3Only Pareto 26.10 Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 44 boards here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Hy3 preview and Pareto 26.10 Preview
BenchmarkHy3 previewPareto 26.10 PreviewLeader
AA Agentic Index24.1Not measuredOnly Hy3 preview measured
τ²-Bench Telecom92.7%Not measuredOnly Hy3 preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 42 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Hy3 preview and Pareto 26.10 Preview
BenchmarkHy3 previewPareto 26.10 PreviewLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)86.7%Not measuredOnly Hy3 preview measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)27.8%Not measuredOnly Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1413Not measuredOnly Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: expert1424Not measuredOnly Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1416Not measuredOnly Hy3 preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Math benchmarks for Hy3 preview and Pareto 26.10 Preview
BenchmarkHy3 previewPareto 26.10 PreviewLeader
LMArena Text: math1424Not measuredOnly Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1442Not measuredOnly Hy3 preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Hy3 preview and Pareto 26.10 Preview
BenchmarkHy3 previewPareto 26.10 PreviewLeader
LMArena Text: science1416Not measuredOnly Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1406Not measuredOnly Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1431Not measuredOnly Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1399Not measuredOnly Hy3 preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index15 boards measured
General benchmarks for Hy3 preview and Pareto 26.10 Preview
BenchmarkHy3 previewPareto 26.10 PreviewLeader
IFBench63.1%Not measuredOnly Hy3 preview measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)64.7%Not measuredOnly Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text1401Not measuredOnly Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1384Not measuredOnly Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1340Not measuredOnly Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: English1409Not measuredOnly Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: non-English1390Not measuredOnly Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1435Not measuredOnly Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: French1422Not measuredOnly Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1401Not measuredOnly Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: Russian1399Not measuredOnly Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1410Not measuredOnly Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1402Not measuredOnly Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1371Not measuredOnly Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1353Not measuredOnly Hy3 preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Hy3 preview$0.0005Fits in one request
Pareto 26.10 Preview$0.0024Fits in one request

Hy3 preview costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Hy3 preview$0.011Fits in one request
Pareto 26.10 Preview$0.050Fits in one request

Hy3 preview costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Hy3 preview$0.042Fits in one request
Pareto 26.10 Preview$0.192Fits in one request

Hy3 preview costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Hy3 preview and Pareto 26.10 Preview
SpecificationTencent Hy3 previewPareto 26.10 Preview
MakerTencentUnbiased
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedApril 22, 2026October 1, 2026
Context window262K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.18$0.80
Output $/Mtok$0.60$3.20
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it10
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Hy3 preview better than Pareto 26.10 Preview for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Hy3 preview for output tokens 5.3x cheaper ($0.60 vs $3.20 per million).

Which is cheaper, Hy3 preview or Pareto 26.10 Preview?

Hy3 preview costs $0.18 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Pareto 26.10 Preview costs $0.80 and $3.20. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Hy3 preview or Pareto 26.10 Preview?

Pareto 26.10 Preview, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

Has any benchmark tested both Hy3 preview and Pareto 26.10 Preview?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Hy3 preview has results on LMArena WebDev, AA Coding Index and Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run); Pareto 26.10 Preview on GameBench 2. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of November 14, 2026.

Compare next