Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Hy-MT2-30B-A3B vs Pareto 26.10 Preview

Hy-MT2-30B-A3B costs 10.8x less per output token than Pareto 26.10 Preview ($0.295 vs $3.20 per million). Updated November 14, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Hy-MT2-30B-A3BTencent
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.295
U Pareto 26.10 PreviewUnbiased
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$3.20
vs $0.295 vs $3.20 per 1M output tokens. Hy-MT2-30B-A3B is 10.8x cheaper.

Hy-MT2-30B-A3B or Pareto 26.10 Preview: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Hy-MT2-30B-A3B for output tokens 10.8x cheaper ($0.295 vs $3.20 per million).

No benchmark has tested both yet. Hy-MT2-30B-A3B has none yet; Pareto 26.10 Preview on GameBench 2. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Hy-MT2-30B-A3B not benchmarked, Pareto 26.10 Preview not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Hy-MT2-30B-A3B $0.295 against Pareto 26.10 Preview $3.20 per million output tokens, 10.8x apart.
Context window
Hy-MT2-30B-A3B takes 8K tokens, Pareto 26.10 Preview 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index1 board measured
Coding benchmarks for Hy-MT2-30B-A3B and Pareto 26.10 Preview
BenchmarkHy-MT2-30B-A3BPareto 26.10 PreviewLeader
GameBench 2Not measured88.3Only Pareto 26.10 Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 51 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Hy-MT2-30B-A3B$0.0002Fits in one request
Pareto 26.10 Preview$0.0024Fits in one request

Hy-MT2-30B-A3B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Hy-MT2-30B-A3B$0.0046Exceeds the context window
Pareto 26.10 Preview$0.050Fits in one request

Hy-MT2-30B-A3B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Hy-MT2-30B-A3B$0.018Exceeds the context window
Pareto 26.10 Preview$0.192Fits in one request

Hy-MT2-30B-A3B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Hy-MT2-30B-A3B and Pareto 26.10 Preview
SpecificationTencent Hy-MT2-30B-A3BPareto 26.10 Preview
MakerTencentUnbiased
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedAugust 20, 2026October 1, 2026
Context window8K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.074$0.80
Output $/Mtok$0.295$3.20
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Hy-MT2-30B-A3B better than Pareto 26.10 Preview for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Hy-MT2-30B-A3B for output tokens 10.8x cheaper ($0.295 vs $3.20 per million).

Which is cheaper, Hy-MT2-30B-A3B or Pareto 26.10 Preview?

Hy-MT2-30B-A3B costs $0.074 per million input tokens and $0.295 per million output tokens; Pareto 26.10 Preview costs $0.80 and $3.20. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Hy-MT2-30B-A3B or Pareto 26.10 Preview?

Pareto 26.10 Preview, with 1.05M tokens against 8K.

Has any benchmark tested both Hy-MT2-30B-A3B and Pareto 26.10 Preview?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Hy-MT2-30B-A3B has none yet; Pareto 26.10 Preview on GameBench 2. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of November 14, 2026.

Compare next