Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Crouton Alpha vs Step 3.5 Flash

Updated November 14, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

S Crouton AlphaStealth
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
No data
Step 3.5 FlashStepFun
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.30
vs 1.05M vs 262K context window. Crouton Alpha fits 4.0x more.

Crouton Alpha or Step 3.5 Flash: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Crouton Alpha for a larger context window (1.05M against 262K tokens).

No benchmark has tested both yet. Crouton Alpha has none yet; Step 3.5 Flash on Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run), LMArena Text: coding and LMArena Text: software and IT. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Crouton Alpha not benchmarked, Step 3.5 Flash not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Crouton Alpha Free against Step 3.5 Flash $0.30 per million output tokens.
Context window
Crouton Alpha takes 1.05M tokens, Step 3.5 Flash 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index3 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Crouton Alpha and Step 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkCrouton AlphaStep 3.5 FlashLeader
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured32.6%Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1435Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1434Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 49 boards here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Crouton Alpha and Step 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkCrouton AlphaStep 3.5 FlashLeader
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured94.4%Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 43 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Crouton Alpha and Step 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkCrouton AlphaStep 3.5 FlashLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured83.1%Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured24.5%Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1410Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1421Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1420Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards measured
Math benchmarks for Crouton Alpha and Step 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkCrouton AlphaStep 3.5 FlashLeader
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1406Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1419Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
MathArenaNot measured18.7%Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Crouton Alpha and Step 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkCrouton AlphaStep 3.5 FlashLeader
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1414Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1408Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1407Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1394Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index19 boards measured
General benchmarks for Crouton Alpha and Step 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkCrouton AlphaStep 3.5 FlashLeader
IFBenchNot measured66.5%Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured63.0%Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena TextNot measured1402Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1385Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1357Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1417Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1385Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1446Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1403Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1353Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1350Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1421Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1418Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1385Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1388Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1404Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1402Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1371Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1359Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Crouton Alpha$0.0000Fits in one request
Step 3.5 Flash$0.0003Fits in one request

Crouton Alpha costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Crouton Alpha$0.0000Fits in one request
Step 3.5 Flash$0.0059Fits in one request

Crouton Alpha costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Crouton Alpha$0.0000Fits in one request
Step 3.5 Flash$0.023Fits in one request

Crouton Alpha costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Crouton Alpha and Step 3.5 Flash
SpecificationCrouton AlphaStepFun Step 3.5 Flash
MakerStealthStepFun
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedNovember 3, 2026January 29, 2026
Context window1.05M262K
Input $/MtokFree$0.10
Output $/MtokFree$0.30
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Crouton Alpha better than Step 3.5 Flash for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Crouton Alpha for a larger context window (1.05M against 262K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Crouton Alpha or Step 3.5 Flash?

Crouton Alpha costs Free per million input tokens and Free per million output tokens; Step 3.5 Flash costs $0.10 and $0.30. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Crouton Alpha or Step 3.5 Flash?

Crouton Alpha, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

Has any benchmark tested both Crouton Alpha and Step 3.5 Flash?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Crouton Alpha has none yet; Step 3.5 Flash on Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run), LMArena Text: coding and LMArena Text: software and IT. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of November 14, 2026.

Compare next