Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B vs Solar Mini 4

Solar Mini 4 costs 3.8x less per output token than Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B ($0.20 vs $0.75 per million). Updated November 14, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

S Llama 3.3 Euryale 70BSao10K
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.75
Solar Mini 4Upstage
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.20
vs $0.75 vs $0.20 per 1M output tokens. Solar Mini 4 is 3.8x cheaper.

Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B or Solar Mini 4: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

No benchmark has tested both yet. Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B has none yet; Solar Mini 4 on SciCode, Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Artificial Analysis run) and Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run). Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B not benchmarked, Solar Mini 4 not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B $0.75 against Solar Mini 4 $0.20 per million output tokens, 3.8x apart.
Context window
Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B takes 131K tokens, Solar Mini 4 524K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index2 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 Euryale 70BSolar Mini 4Leader
SciCodeNot measured47.6%Only Solar Mini 4 measured
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured1.0%Only Solar Mini 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 50 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 Euryale 70BSolar Mini 4Leader
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured25.8%Only Solar Mini 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 Euryale 70BSolar Mini 4Leader
AA-OmniscienceNot measured-11.6Only Solar Mini 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 Euryale 70BSolar Mini 4Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1144Only Solar Mini 4 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1087Only Solar Mini 4 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1097Only Solar Mini 4 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1135Only Solar Mini 4 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1084Only Solar Mini 4 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1127Only Solar Mini 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
General benchmarks for Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 Euryale 70BSolar Mini 4Leader
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured83.3%Only Solar Mini 4 measured
GDPval-AANot measured1092Only Solar Mini 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 47 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B$0.0010Fits in one request
Solar Mini 4$0.0001Fits in one request

Solar Mini 4 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B$0.035Fits in one request
Solar Mini 4$0.0031Fits in one request

Solar Mini 4 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B$0.138Exceeds the context window
Solar Mini 4$0.012Fits in one request

Solar Mini 4 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B and Solar Mini 4
SpecificationSao10K Llama 3.3 Euryale 70BUpstage Solar Mini 4
MakerSao10KUpstage
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedDecember 18, 2024September 23, 2026
Context window131K524K
Input $/Mtok$0.65$0.05
Output $/Mtok$0.75$0.20
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B better than Solar Mini 4 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B or Solar Mini 4?

Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B costs $0.65 per million input tokens and $0.75 per million output tokens; Solar Mini 4 costs $0.05 and $0.20. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B or Solar Mini 4?

Solar Mini 4, with 524K tokens against 131K.

Has any benchmark tested both Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B and Solar Mini 4?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B has none yet; Solar Mini 4 on SciCode, Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Artificial Analysis run) and Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run). Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of November 14, 2026.

Compare next