Ripple 65B Preview vs Solar Pro 3
Ripple 65B Preview and Solar Pro 3 cost about the same per output token ($0.60 vs $0.60 per million). Updated November 14, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.
- Coding
- No data
- Overall
- No data
- Output $/M
- $0.60
- Coding
- No data
- Overall
- No data
- Output $/M
- $0.60
Ripple 65B Preview or Solar Pro 3: which to pick
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick Ripple 65B Preview for a larger context window (1.05M against 131K tokens).
No benchmark has tested both yet. Ripple 65B Preview has none yet; Solar Pro 3 on SciCode, Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) and Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Artificial Analysis run). Compare them on price and context instead.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Long documents
Listed context window
Ripple 65B Preview
Ripple 65B Preview takes 1.05M tokens against 131K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Solar Pro 3
Ripple 65B Preview $0.0005, Solar Pro 3 $0.0004 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- Ripple 65B Preview not benchmarked, Solar Pro 3 not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
- Widest single gap
- None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
- Output price
- Both cost $0.60 per million output tokens.
- Context window
- Ripple 65B Preview takes 1.05M tokens, Solar Pro 3 131K.
Benchmark by benchmark
Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index3 boards measured
| Benchmark | Ripple 65B Preview | Solar Pro 3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| SciCode | Not measured | 25.5% | Only Solar Pro 3 measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 7.6% | Only Solar Pro 3 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 0.0% | Only Solar Pro 3 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 49 boards here | |||
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
| Benchmark | Ripple 65B Preview | Solar Pro 3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| τ²-Bench Telecom | Not measured | 86.3% | Only Solar Pro 3 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 43 boards here | |||
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
| Benchmark | Ripple 65B Preview | Solar Pro 3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 72.4% | Only Solar Pro 3 measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 10.3% | Only Solar Pro 3 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here | |||
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
| Benchmark | Ripple 65B Preview | Solar Pro 3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-Omniscience | Not measured | -53.7 | Only Solar Pro 3 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here | |||
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards measured
| Benchmark | Ripple 65B Preview | Solar Pro 3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFBench | Not measured | 71.2% | Only Solar Pro 3 measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | Not measured | 32.3% | Only Solar Pro 3 measured |
| GDPval-AA | Not measured | 272 | Only Solar Pro 3 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 46 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Solar Pro 3 costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Solar Pro 3 costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Solar Pro 3 costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Ricursive Ripple 65B Preview | Upstage Solar Pro 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Ricursiveai | Upstage |
| Weights | Open weights | No public weights listed |
| Released | November 4, 2026 | January 27, 2026 |
| Context window | 1.05M | 131K |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.20 | $0.15 |
| Output $/Mtok | $0.60 | $0.60 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Ripple 65B Preview better than Solar Pro 3 for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Ripple 65B Preview for a larger context window (1.05M against 131K tokens).
Which is cheaper, Ripple 65B Preview or Solar Pro 3?
Ripple 65B Preview costs $0.20 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Solar Pro 3 costs $0.15 and $0.60. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, Ripple 65B Preview or Solar Pro 3?
Ripple 65B Preview, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.
Has any benchmark tested both Ripple 65B Preview and Solar Pro 3?
No benchmark has tested both yet. Ripple 65B Preview has none yet; Solar Pro 3 on SciCode, Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) and Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Artificial Analysis run). Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of November 14, 2026.