Relace Apply 3 vs Pareto 26.10 Preview
Relace Apply 3 costs 2.6x less per output token than Pareto 26.10 Preview ($1.25 vs $3.20 per million). Updated November 14, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.
- Coding
- No data
- Overall
- No data
- Output $/M
- $1.25
- Coding
- No data
- Overall
- No data
- Output $/M
- $3.20
Relace Apply 3 or Pareto 26.10 Preview: which to pick
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick Relace Apply 3 for output tokens 2.6x cheaper ($1.25 vs $3.20 per million).
No benchmark has tested both yet. Relace Apply 3 has none yet; Pareto 26.10 Preview on GameBench 2. Compare them on price and context instead.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Long documents
Listed context window
Pareto 26.10 Preview
Pareto 26.10 Preview takes 1.05M tokens against 256K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Relace Apply 3
Relace Apply 3 $0.0015, Pareto 26.10 Preview $0.0024 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- Relace Apply 3 not benchmarked, Pareto 26.10 Preview not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
- Widest single gap
- None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
- Output price
- Relace Apply 3 $1.25 against Pareto 26.10 Preview $3.20 per million output tokens, 2.6x apart.
- Context window
- Relace Apply 3 takes 256K tokens, Pareto 26.10 Preview 1.05M.
Benchmark by benchmark
Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index1 board measured
| Benchmark | Relace Apply 3 | Pareto 26.10 Preview | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GameBench 2 | Not measured | 88.3 | Only Pareto 26.10 Preview measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 51 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Relace Apply 3 costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Relace Apply 3 costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Relace Apply 3 costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Relace Apply 3 | Pareto 26.10 Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Relace | Unbiased |
| Weights | No public weights listed | No public weights listed |
| Released | September 26, 2025 | October 1, 2026 |
| Context window | 256K | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.85 | $0.80 |
| Output $/Mtok | $1.25 | $3.20 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Relace Apply 3 better than Pareto 26.10 Preview for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Relace Apply 3 for output tokens 2.6x cheaper ($1.25 vs $3.20 per million).
Which is cheaper, Relace Apply 3 or Pareto 26.10 Preview?
Relace Apply 3 costs $0.85 per million input tokens and $1.25 per million output tokens; Pareto 26.10 Preview costs $0.80 and $3.20. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, Relace Apply 3 or Pareto 26.10 Preview?
Pareto 26.10 Preview, with 1.05M tokens against 256K.
Has any benchmark tested both Relace Apply 3 and Pareto 26.10 Preview?
No benchmark has tested both yet. Relace Apply 3 has none yet; Pareto 26.10 Preview on GameBench 2. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of November 14, 2026.