LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Beam 1.0 501B A23B vs Hy3

Updated October 21, 2026. 28 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

R Beam 1.0 501B A23BReflection
Coding
33.8
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.00
7
Hy3Tencent
Coding
43.9
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.528
21
vs boards won of 28 shared

Decision reading

Pick Hy3 for coding: it scores 43.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 33.8 for Beam 1.0 501B A23B.

Pick Beam 1.0 501B A23B when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 262K tokens, or when what matters is LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: legal and government, where it leads.

Shared results
28
Beam 1.0 501B A23B only
0
Hy3 only
16
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Beam 1.0 501B A23B 33.8 from 1 benchmark, Hy3 43.9 from 1 benchmark.
Widest category
Coding, 6.3 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare: Beam 1.0 501B A23B 1376 against Hy3 1452, 12.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Beam 1.0 501B A23B $1.00 against Hy3 $0.528 per million output tokens, 1.9x apart.
Context window
Beam 1.0 501B A23B takes 1.05M tokens, Hy3 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryBeam 1.0 501B A23BBarsHy3Ties
Coding14
Reasoning03
Math02
Knowledge22
Web design20
General210
All shared boards721
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index14
Coding benchmarks for Beam 1.0 501B A23B and Hy3
BenchmarkBeam 1.0 501B A23BHy3Leader
LMArena WebDev14371507Hy3
SciCodeNot measured48.6%Only Hy3 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured838.6Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: coding14731466Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: software and IT14611463Hy3
LMArena WebDev: React14431511Hy3
LMArena WebDev: HTML14361487Hy3
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
IntelligenceNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Beam 1.0 501B A23B and Hy3
BenchmarkBeam 1.0 501B A23BHy3Leader
Neither model has a result on 2 boards here
Agentic workNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Beam 1.0 501B A23B and Hy3
BenchmarkBeam 1.0 501B A23BHy3Leader
Neither model has a result on 39 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Reasoning benchmarks for Beam 1.0 501B A23B and Hy3
BenchmarkBeam 1.0 501B A23BHy3Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured89.7%Only Hy3 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured33.5%Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14421447Hy3
LMArena Text: expert14471461Hy3
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14511455Hy3
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Beam 1.0 501B A23B and Hy3
BenchmarkBeam 1.0 501B A23BHy3Leader
LMArena Text: math14591473Hy3
LMArena Text: mathematical work14751482Hy3
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index22
Knowledge benchmarks for Beam 1.0 501B A23B and Hy3
BenchmarkBeam 1.0 501B A23BHy3Leader
LMArena Text: science14301457Hy3
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13761452Hy3
LMArena Text: legal and government14331422Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: business and finance14301424Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Web design benchmarks for Beam 1.0 501B A23B and Hy3
BenchmarkBeam 1.0 501B A23BHy3Leader
Design Arena: websites12531230Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1205Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: game dev12221208Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1163Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1233Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1227Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1199Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1157Only Hy3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index210
General benchmarks for Beam 1.0 501B A23B and Hy3
BenchmarkBeam 1.0 501B A23BHy3Leader
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured79.0%Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text14251438Hy3
LMArena Text: instruction following14301426Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: creative writing13901403Hy3
LMArena Text: English14361448Hy3
LMArena Text: non-English14131426Hy3
LMArena Text: Chinese14241485Hy3
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1449Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1397Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1396Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: French14611456Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1457Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: Russian14121432Hy3
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1447Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn14141436Hy3
LMArena Text: longer queries14291442Hy3
LMArena Text: writing and language14001414Hy3
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13991400Hy3
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Beam 1.0 501B A23B and Hy3
BenchmarkBeam 1.0 501B A23BHy3Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Beam 1.0 501B A23B$0.0008Fits in one request
Hy3$0.0004Fits in one request

Hy3 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Beam 1.0 501B A23B$0.018Fits in one request
Hy3$0.0082Fits in one request

Hy3 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Beam 1.0 501B A23B$0.070Fits in one request
Hy3$0.032Fits in one request

Hy3 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Beam 1.0 501B A23B and Hy3
SpecificationReflection Beam 1.0 501B A23BTencent Hy3
MakerReflectionTencent
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedOctober 16, 2026July 6, 2026
Context window1.05M262K
Input $/Mtok$0.30$0.132
Output $/Mtok$1.00$0.528
Coding index33.843.9
Independent measurements behind it11
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Beam 1.0 501B A23B better than Hy3 for coding?

Pick Hy3 for coding: it scores 43.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 33.8 for Beam 1.0 501B A23B. Pick Beam 1.0 501B A23B when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 262K tokens, or when what matters is LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: legal and government, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Beam 1.0 501B A23B or Hy3?

Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.00 per million output tokens; Hy3 costs $0.132 and $0.528. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Beam 1.0 501B A23B or Hy3?

Beam 1.0 501B A23B, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Beam 1.0 501B A23B vs Hy3 comparison based on?

28 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Beam 1.0 501B A23B's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Hy3's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next