Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Qwen3.7 Flash vs Solar Mini 4

Qwen3.7 Flash costs 1.5x less per output token than Solar Mini 4 ($0.13 vs $0.20 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Qwen3.7 FlashQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.13
Solar Mini 4Upstage
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.20
vs $0.13 vs $0.20 per 1M output tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash is 1.5x cheaper.

Qwen3.7 Flash or Solar Mini 4: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen3.7 Flash for output tokens 1.5x cheaper ($0.13 vs $0.20 per million) and a larger context window (1M against 524K tokens).

No benchmark has tested both yet. Qwen3.7 Flash has results on ALE-Bench, Epoch Capabilities Index and GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run); Solar Mini 4 on SciCode, AA Intelligence Index and Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run). Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Qwen3.7 Flash not benchmarked, Solar Mini 4 not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Qwen3.7 Flash $0.13 against Solar Mini 4 $0.20 per million output tokens, 1.5x apart.
Context window
Qwen3.7 Flash takes 1M tokens, Solar Mini 4 524K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index2 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Qwen3.7 Flash and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkQwen3.7 FlashSolar Mini 4Leader
SciCodeNot measured47.6%Only Solar Mini 4 measured
ALE-Bench420.1Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Qwen3.7 Flash and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkQwen3.7 FlashSolar Mini 4Leader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured24.1Only Solar Mini 4 measured
Epoch Capabilities Index144.1Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Flash measured
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Qwen3.7 Flash and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkQwen3.7 FlashSolar Mini 4Leader
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured25.8%Only Solar Mini 4 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)82.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Flash measured
Mystery game puzzles15.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Math benchmarks for Qwen3.7 Flash and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkQwen3.7 FlashSolar Mini 4Leader
OTIS Mock AIME86.7%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Flash measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 319.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for Qwen3.7 Flash and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkQwen3.7 FlashSolar Mini 4Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1159Only Solar Mini 4 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1109Only Solar Mini 4 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1150Only Solar Mini 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
General benchmarks for Qwen3.7 Flash and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkQwen3.7 FlashSolar Mini 4Leader
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured83.3%Only Solar Mini 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 45 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Qwen3.7 Flash$0.0001Fits in one request
Solar Mini 4$0.0001Fits in one request

Qwen3.7 Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Qwen3.7 Flash$0.0019Fits in one request
Solar Mini 4$0.0031Fits in one request

Qwen3.7 Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Qwen3.7 Flash$0.0073Fits in one request
Solar Mini 4$0.012Fits in one request

Qwen3.7 Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Qwen3.7 Flash and Solar Mini 4
SpecificationQwen3.7 FlashUpstage Solar Mini 4
MakerQwenUpstage
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedJuly 27, 2026September 23, 2026
Context window1M524K
Input $/Mtok$0.03$0.05
Output $/Mtok$0.13$0.20
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Qwen3.7 Flash better than Solar Mini 4 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3.7 Flash for output tokens 1.5x cheaper ($0.13 vs $0.20 per million) and a larger context window (1M against 524K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.7 Flash or Solar Mini 4?

Qwen3.7 Flash costs $0.03 per million input tokens and $0.13 per million output tokens; Solar Mini 4 costs $0.05 and $0.20. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3.7 Flash or Solar Mini 4?

Qwen3.7 Flash, with 1M tokens against 524K.

Has any benchmark tested both Qwen3.7 Flash and Solar Mini 4?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Qwen3.7 Flash has results on ALE-Bench, Epoch Capabilities Index and GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run); Solar Mini 4 on SciCode, AA Intelligence Index and Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run). Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next