Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B

Qwen3.6 35B A3B costs 1.6x less per output token than Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 ($1.00 vs $1.56 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15Qwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.56
Qwen3.6 35B A3BQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
45.0
Output $/M
$1.00
vs $1.56 vs $1.00 per 1M output tokens. Qwen3.6 35B A3B is 1.6x cheaper.

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 or Qwen3.6 35B A3B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 for a larger context window (1M against 262K tokens).

No benchmark has tested both yet. Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 has results on Design Arena: websites, Design Arena: UI components and Design Arena: game dev; Qwen3.6 35B A3B on AA Coding Index, SciCode and Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run). Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 not benchmarked, Qwen3.6 35B A3B not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 $1.56 against Qwen3.6 35B A3B $1.00 per million output tokens, 1.6x apart.
Context window
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 takes 1M tokens, Qwen3.6 35B A3B 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index5 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15Qwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
AA Coding IndexNot measured41.9Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
SciCodeNot measured36.6%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured34.8%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
Terminal-BenchNot measured24.6%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
WeirdMLNot measured34.5%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15Qwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured18.2Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured143.7Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15Qwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured13.1Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured95.3%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15Qwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured84.1%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured22.2%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured84.8%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured22.0%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Math benchmarks for Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15Qwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured86.7%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured20.4%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15Qwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
Design Arena: websites1187Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 measured
Design Arena: UI components1175Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 measured
Design Arena: game dev1105Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 measured
Design Arena: data viz1135Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 measured
Design Arena: 3D1118Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1166Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 measured
Design Arena: SVG1107Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1094Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards measured
General benchmarks for Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15Qwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
IFBenchNot measured64.4%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured71.7%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
DTBenchNot measured73.9%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
LMCANot measured29.7%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured44.4%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 43 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15$0.0010Fits in one request
Qwen3.6 35B A3B$0.0006Fits in one request

Qwen3.6 35B A3B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15$0.018Fits in one request
Qwen3.6 35B A3B$0.0080Fits in one request

Qwen3.6 35B A3B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15$0.068Fits in one request
Qwen3.6 35B A3B$0.030Fits in one request

Qwen3.6 35B A3B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
SpecificationQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15Qwen3.6 35B A3B
MakerQwenQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedFebruary 16, 2026April 27, 2026
Context window1M262K
Input $/Mtok$0.26$0.10
Output $/Mtok$1.56$1.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 better than Qwen3.6 35B A3B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 for a larger context window (1M against 262K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 or Qwen3.6 35B A3B?

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 costs $0.26 per million input tokens and $1.56 per million output tokens; Qwen3.6 35B A3B costs $0.10 and $1.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 or Qwen3.6 35B A3B?

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15, with 1M tokens against 262K.

Has any benchmark tested both Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 and Qwen3.6 35B A3B?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 has results on Design Arena: websites, Design Arena: UI components and Design Arena: game dev; Qwen3.6 35B A3B on AA Coding Index, SciCode and Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run). Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next