Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Solar Mini 4

Solar Mini 4 leads Qwen3.5 397B A17B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 24.1 to 21.4, and Solar Mini 4 costs 11.7x less per output token ($0.20 vs $2.34 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 8 benchmarks have a result for both.

Qwen3.5 397B A17BQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
57.1
Output $/M
$2.34
5
Solar Mini 4Upstage
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.20
3
vs boards won of 8 shared

Qwen3.5 397B A17B or Solar Mini 4: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen3.5 397B A17B for work measured by SciCode or AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Shared results
8
Qwen3.5 397B A17B only
57
Solar Mini 4 only
0
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Qwen3.5 397B A17B not benchmarked, Solar Mini 4 not benchmarked.
Widest category
General, 6.0 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: UI components: Qwen3.5 397B A17B 1161 against Solar Mini 4 1074, 10.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Qwen3.5 397B A17B $2.34 against Solar Mini 4 $0.20 per million output tokens, 11.7x apart.
Context window
Qwen3.5 397B A17B takes 262K tokens, Solar Mini 4 524K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryQwen3.5 397B A17BBarsSolar Mini 4Ties
Coding01
Intelligence01
Reasoning10
Web design40
General01
All shared boards53
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index01
Coding benchmarks for Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkQwen3.5 397B A17BSolar Mini 4Leader
LMArena WebDev1400Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
SciCode44.8%47.6%Solar Mini 4
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)40.9%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
ALE-Bench621.9Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: coding1464Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1463Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena WebDev: React1388Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1410Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkQwen3.5 397B A17BSolar Mini 4Leader
AA Intelligence Index21.424.1Solar Mini 4
Epoch Capabilities Index146.8Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkQwen3.5 397B A17BSolar Mini 4Leader
τ²-Bench Telecom95.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
APEX-Agents24.9%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Reasoning benchmarks for Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkQwen3.5 397B A17BSolar Mini 4Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)89.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)29.0%25.8%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)86.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Mystery game puzzles18.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1448Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: expert1462Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1450Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1277Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: homework1292Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkQwen3.5 397B A17BSolar Mini 4Leader
OTIS Mock AIME88.9%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 331.2%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: math1453Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1454Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkQwen3.5 397B A17BSolar Mini 4Leader
LMArena Text: science1457Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1455Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1441Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1435Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Web design benchmarks for Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkQwen3.5 397B A17BSolar Mini 4Leader
Design Arena: websites11901159Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Design Arena: UI components11611074Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Design Arena: game dev11401105Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Design Arena: data viz1175Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Design Arena: 3D1160Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Design Arena: all code categories11791149Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Design Arena: SVG1139Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
General benchmarks for Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkQwen3.5 397B A17BSolar Mini 4Leader
IFBench78.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)77.3%83.3%Solar Mini 4
DTBench87.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMCA37.9%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text1437Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1424Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1402Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision1262Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: English1443Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: non-English1430Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1498Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: German1445Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1429Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: Korean1384Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: French1462Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1441Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: Russian1430Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: Polish1447Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1446Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1441Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1415Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1399Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: English1268Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1314Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1271Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: humor1262Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1230Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1265Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1260Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkQwen3.5 397B A17BSolar Mini 4Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Qwen3.5 397B A17B$0.0016Fits in one request
Solar Mini 4$0.0001Fits in one request

Solar Mini 4 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Qwen3.5 397B A17B$0.027Fits in one request
Solar Mini 4$0.0031Fits in one request

Solar Mini 4 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Qwen3.5 397B A17B$0.101Fits in one request
Solar Mini 4$0.012Fits in one request

Solar Mini 4 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Solar Mini 4
SpecificationQwen3.5 397B A17BUpstage Solar Mini 4
MakerQwenUpstage
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedFebruary 16, 2026September 23, 2026
Context window262K524K
Input $/Mtok$0.39$0.05
Output $/Mtok$2.34$0.20
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it10
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Qwen3.5 397B A17B better than Solar Mini 4 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3.5 397B A17B for work measured by SciCode or AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5 397B A17B or Solar Mini 4?

Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs $0.39 per million input tokens and $2.34 per million output tokens; Solar Mini 4 costs $0.05 and $0.20. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3.5 397B A17B or Solar Mini 4?

Solar Mini 4, with 524K tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Solar Mini 4 comparison based on?

8 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Qwen3.5 397B A17B's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Solar Mini 4's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next