Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Relace Search

Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs 1.3x less per output token than Relace Search ($2.34 vs $3.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Qwen3.5 397B A17BQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
57.1
Output $/M
$2.34
Relace SearchRelace
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$3.00
vs $2.34 vs $3.00 per 1M output tokens. Qwen3.5 397B A17B is 1.3x cheaper.

Qwen3.5 397B A17B or Relace Search: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen3.5 397B A17B for output tokens 1.3x cheaper ($2.34 vs $3.00 per million) and a larger context window (262K against 256K tokens).

No benchmark has tested both yet. Qwen3.5 397B A17B has results on LMArena WebDev, SciCode and Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run); Relace Search has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Qwen3.5 397B A17B not benchmarked, Relace Search not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Qwen3.5 397B A17B $2.34 against Relace Search $3.00 per million output tokens, 1.3x apart.
Context window
Qwen3.5 397B A17B takes 262K tokens, Relace Search 256K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index8 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Relace Search
BenchmarkQwen3.5 397B A17BRelace SearchLeader
LMArena WebDev1400Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
SciCode44.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)40.9%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
ALE-Bench621.9Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: coding1464Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1463Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena WebDev: React1388Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1410Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Relace Search
BenchmarkQwen3.5 397B A17BRelace SearchLeader
AA Intelligence Index21.4Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Epoch Capabilities Index146.8Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Relace Search
BenchmarkQwen3.5 397B A17BRelace SearchLeader
τ²-Bench Telecom95.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
APEX-Agents24.9%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Relace Search
BenchmarkQwen3.5 397B A17BRelace SearchLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)89.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)29.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)86.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Mystery game puzzles18.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1448Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: expert1462Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1450Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1277Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: homework1292Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Math benchmarks for Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Relace Search
BenchmarkQwen3.5 397B A17BRelace SearchLeader
OTIS Mock AIME88.9%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 331.2%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: math1453Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1454Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Relace Search
BenchmarkQwen3.5 397B A17BRelace SearchLeader
LMArena Text: science1457Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1455Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1441Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1435Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Relace Search
BenchmarkQwen3.5 397B A17BRelace SearchLeader
Design Arena: websites1190Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Design Arena: UI components1160Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Design Arena: game dev1140Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Design Arena: data viz1175Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Design Arena: 3D1160Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Design Arena: all code categories1179Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Design Arena: SVG1139Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index29 boards measured
General benchmarks for Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Relace Search
BenchmarkQwen3.5 397B A17BRelace SearchLeader
IFBench78.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)77.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
DTBench87.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMCA37.9%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text1437Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1424Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1402Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision1262Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: English1443Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: non-English1430Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1498Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: German1445Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1429Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: Korean1384Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: French1462Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1441Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: Russian1430Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: Polish1447Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1446Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1441Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1415Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1399Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: English1268Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1314Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1271Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: humor1262Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1230Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1265Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1260Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Qwen3.5 397B A17B$0.0016Fits in one request
Relace Search$0.0025Fits in one request

Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Qwen3.5 397B A17B$0.027Fits in one request
Relace Search$0.059Fits in one request

Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Qwen3.5 397B A17B$0.101Fits in one request
Relace Search$0.230Fits in one request

Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Relace Search
SpecificationQwen3.5 397B A17BRelace Search
MakerQwenRelace
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedFebruary 16, 2026December 8, 2025
Context window262K256K
Input $/Mtok$0.39$1.00
Output $/Mtok$2.34$3.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it10
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Qwen3.5 397B A17B better than Relace Search for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3.5 397B A17B for output tokens 1.3x cheaper ($2.34 vs $3.00 per million) and a larger context window (262K against 256K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5 397B A17B or Relace Search?

Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs $0.39 per million input tokens and $2.34 per million output tokens; Relace Search costs $1.00 and $3.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3.5 397B A17B or Relace Search?

Qwen3.5 397B A17B, with 262K tokens against 256K.

Has any benchmark tested both Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Relace Search?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Qwen3.5 397B A17B has results on LMArena WebDev, SciCode and Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run); Relace Search has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next