Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Qwen3 Coder Next

Qwen3.5 397B A17B leads Qwen3 Coder Next on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 21.4 to 9.2, and Qwen3 Coder Next costs 2.9x less per output token ($0.80 vs $2.34 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 8 benchmarks have a result for both.

Qwen3.5 397B A17BQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
57.1
Output $/M
$2.34
8
Qwen3 Coder NextQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.80
0
vs boards won of 8 shared

Qwen3.5 397B A17B or Qwen3 Coder Next: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
8
Qwen3.5 397B A17B only
57
Qwen3 Coder Next only
3
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Qwen3.5 397B A17B not benchmarked, Qwen3 Coder Next not benchmarked.
Widest category
General, 36.9 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
IFBench: Qwen3.5 397B A17B 78.8% against Qwen3 Coder Next 35.2%, 43.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Qwen3.5 397B A17B $2.34 against Qwen3 Coder Next $0.80 per million output tokens, 2.9x apart.
Context window
Both take 262K tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryQwen3.5 397B A17BBarsQwen3 Coder NextTies
Coding20
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Reasoning20
General20
All shared boards80
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Qwen3 Coder Next
BenchmarkQwen3.5 397B A17BQwen3 Coder NextLeader
LMArena WebDev1400Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured36.2Only Qwen3 Coder Next measured
SciCode44.8%36.2%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)40.9%18.2%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
WeirdMLNot measured34.4%Only Qwen3 Coder Next measured
ALE-Bench621.9Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: coding1464Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1463Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena WebDev: React1388Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1410Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Qwen3 Coder Next
BenchmarkQwen3.5 397B A17BQwen3 Coder NextLeader
AA Intelligence Index21.49.2Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Epoch Capabilities Index146.8Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Qwen3 Coder Next
BenchmarkQwen3.5 397B A17BQwen3 Coder NextLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured0.9Only Qwen3 Coder Next measured
τ²-Bench Telecom95.6%79.5%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
APEX-Agents24.9%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Reasoning benchmarks for Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Qwen3 Coder Next
BenchmarkQwen3.5 397B A17BQwen3 Coder NextLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)89.3%73.7%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)29.0%10.1%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)86.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Mystery game puzzles18.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1448Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: expert1462Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1450Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1277Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: homework1292Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Qwen3 Coder Next
BenchmarkQwen3.5 397B A17BQwen3 Coder NextLeader
OTIS Mock AIME88.9%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 331.2%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: math1453Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1454Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Qwen3 Coder Next
BenchmarkQwen3.5 397B A17BQwen3 Coder NextLeader
LMArena Text: science1457Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1455Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1441Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1435Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Qwen3 Coder Next
BenchmarkQwen3.5 397B A17BQwen3 Coder NextLeader
Design Arena: websites1190Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Design Arena: UI components1160Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Design Arena: game dev1140Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Design Arena: data viz1175Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Design Arena: 3D1160Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Design Arena: all code categories1179Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Design Arena: SVG1139Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
General benchmarks for Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Qwen3 Coder Next
BenchmarkQwen3.5 397B A17BQwen3 Coder NextLeader
IFBench78.8%35.2%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)77.3%47.0%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
DTBench87.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMCA37.9%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text1437Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1424Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1402Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision1262Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: English1443Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: non-English1430Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1498Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: German1445Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1429Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: Korean1384Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: French1462Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1441Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: Russian1430Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: Polish1447Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1446Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1441Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1415Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1399Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: English1268Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1314Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1271Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: humor1262Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1230Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1265Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1260Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Qwen3 Coder Next
BenchmarkQwen3.5 397B A17BQwen3 Coder NextLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Qwen3.5 397B A17B$0.0016Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder Next$0.0005Fits in one request

Qwen3 Coder Next costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Qwen3.5 397B A17B$0.027Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder Next$0.0084Fits in one request

Qwen3 Coder Next costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Qwen3.5 397B A17B$0.101Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder Next$0.032Fits in one request

Qwen3 Coder Next costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Qwen3 Coder Next
SpecificationQwen3.5 397B A17BQwen3 Coder Next
MakerQwenQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedFebruary 16, 2026February 4, 2026
Context window262K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.39$0.12
Output $/Mtok$2.34$0.80
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it10
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Qwen3.5 397B A17B better than Qwen3 Coder Next for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5 397B A17B or Qwen3 Coder Next?

Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs $0.39 per million input tokens and $2.34 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Coder Next costs $0.12 and $0.80. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3.5 397B A17B or Qwen3 Coder Next?

Neither: both take 262K tokens.

How many benchmarks is the Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Qwen3 Coder Next comparison based on?

8 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Qwen3.5 397B A17B's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Qwen3 Coder Next's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next