LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct

Updated October 21, 2026. 10 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Qwen3.5 397B A17BQwen
Coding
28.6
Overall
21.4
Output $/M
$2.34
10
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructQwen
Coding
60.4
Overall
9.6
Output $/M
$0.28
0
vs boards won of 10 shared

Decision reading

Pick Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct for coding: it scores 60.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 28.6 for Qwen3.5 397B A17B.

Pick Qwen3.5 397B A17B when what matters is Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) or AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Shared results
10
Qwen3.5 397B A17B only
55
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct only
6
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Qwen3.5 397B A17B 28.6 from 1 benchmark, Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct 60.4 from 1 benchmark.
Widest category
Agentic work, 61.1 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: Qwen3.5 397B A17B 95.6% against Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct 34.5%, 61.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Qwen3.5 397B A17B $2.34 against Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct $0.28 per million output tokens, 8.4x apart.
Context window
Both take 262K tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryQwen3.5 397B A17BBarsQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructTies
Coding10
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Reasoning20
Web design30
General20
All shared boards100
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index10
Coding benchmarks for Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkQwen3.5 397B A17BQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured60.4%Only Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
SWE-bench LiteNot measured49.7%Only Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
LMArena WebDev1400Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured40.3%Only Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
SciCode44.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)40.9%15.2%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
ALE-Bench621.9Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: coding1464Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1463Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena WebDev: React1388Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1410Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkQwen3.5 397B A17BQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence Index21.49.6Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Epoch Capabilities Index146.8Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkQwen3.5 397B A17BQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
τ²-Bench Telecom95.6%34.5%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
APEX-Agents24.9%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Reasoning benchmarks for Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkQwen3.5 397B A17BQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)89.3%51.6%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)29.0%3.8%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)86.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Mystery game puzzles18.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1448Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: expert1462Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1450Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1277Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: homework1292Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkQwen3.5 397B A17BQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
AA Math IndexNot measured29.0Only Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured29.0%Only Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
OTIS Mock AIME88.9%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 331.2%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: math1453Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1454Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkQwen3.5 397B A17BQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured70.6%Only Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: science1457Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1455Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1441Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1435Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Web design benchmarks for Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkQwen3.5 397B A17BQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
Design Arena: websites11911087Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Design Arena: UI components11631046Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Design Arena: game dev1141Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Design Arena: data viz11751085Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Design Arena: 3D1161Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Design Arena: all code categories1180Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Design Arena: SVG1139Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
General benchmarks for Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkQwen3.5 397B A17BQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
IFBench78.8%32.7%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)77.3%32.7%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
DTBench87.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMCA37.9%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text1437Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1424Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1402Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision1262Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: English1443Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: non-English1430Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1498Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: German1445Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1429Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: Korean1384Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: French1462Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1441Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: Russian1430Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: Polish1447Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1446Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1441Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1415Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1399Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: English1268Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1314Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1271Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: humor1262Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1230Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1265Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1260Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkQwen3.5 397B A17BQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Qwen3.5 397B A17B$0.0016Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct$0.0002Fits in one request

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Qwen3.5 397B A17B$0.027Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct$0.0043Fits in one request

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Qwen3.5 397B A17B$0.101Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct$0.017Fits in one request

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
SpecificationQwen3.5 397B A17BQwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
MakerQwenQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedFebruary 16, 2026July 31, 2025
Context window262K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.39$0.07
Output $/Mtok$2.34$0.28
Coding index28.660.4
Independent measurements behind it11
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Qwen3.5 397B A17B better than Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct for coding?

Pick Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct for coding: it scores 60.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 28.6 for Qwen3.5 397B A17B. Pick Qwen3.5 397B A17B when what matters is Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) or AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5 397B A17B or Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct?

Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs $0.39 per million input tokens and $2.34 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct costs $0.07 and $0.28. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3.5 397B A17B or Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct?

Neither: both take 262K tokens.

How many benchmarks is the Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct comparison based on?

10 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Qwen3.5 397B A17B's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next