Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen3.7 Flash costs 18.0x less per output token than Qwen3.5 397B A17B ($0.13 vs $2.34 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 6 benchmarks have a result for both.

Qwen3.5 397B A17BQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
57.1
Output $/M
$2.34
6
Qwen3.7 FlashQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.13
0
vs boards won of 6 shared

Qwen3.5 397B A17B or Qwen3.7 Flash: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
6
Qwen3.5 397B A17B only
59
Qwen3.7 Flash only
0
Like-for-like categories
4 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Qwen3.5 397B A17B not benchmarked, Qwen3.7 Flash not benchmarked.
Widest category
Math, 7.1 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3: Qwen3.5 397B A17B 31.2% against Qwen3.7 Flash 19.3%, 11.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Qwen3.5 397B A17B $2.34 against Qwen3.7 Flash $0.13 per million output tokens, 18.0x apart.
Context window
Qwen3.5 397B A17B takes 262K tokens, Qwen3.7 Flash 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryQwen3.5 397B A17BBarsQwen3.7 FlashTies
Coding10
Intelligence10
Reasoning20
Math20
All shared boards60
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index10
Coding benchmarks for Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Qwen3.7 Flash
BenchmarkQwen3.5 397B A17BQwen3.7 FlashLeader
LMArena WebDev1400Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
SciCode44.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)40.9%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
ALE-Bench621.9420.1Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: coding1464Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1463Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena WebDev: React1388Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1410Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Qwen3.7 Flash
BenchmarkQwen3.5 397B A17BQwen3.7 FlashLeader
AA Intelligence Index21.4Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Epoch Capabilities Index146.8144.1Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Qwen3.7 Flash
BenchmarkQwen3.5 397B A17BQwen3.7 FlashLeader
τ²-Bench Telecom95.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
APEX-Agents24.9%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Reasoning benchmarks for Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Qwen3.7 Flash
BenchmarkQwen3.5 397B A17BQwen3.7 FlashLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)89.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)29.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)86.4%82.3%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Mystery game puzzles18.0%15.0%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: hard prompts1448Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: expert1462Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1450Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1277Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: homework1292Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Qwen3.7 Flash
BenchmarkQwen3.5 397B A17BQwen3.7 FlashLeader
OTIS Mock AIME88.9%86.7%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 331.2%19.3%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: math1453Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1454Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Qwen3.7 Flash
BenchmarkQwen3.5 397B A17BQwen3.7 FlashLeader
LMArena Text: science1457Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1455Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1441Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1435Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Qwen3.7 Flash
BenchmarkQwen3.5 397B A17BQwen3.7 FlashLeader
Design Arena: websites1190Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Design Arena: UI components1160Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Design Arena: game dev1140Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Design Arena: data viz1175Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Design Arena: 3D1160Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Design Arena: all code categories1179Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Design Arena: SVG1139Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index29 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Qwen3.7 Flash
BenchmarkQwen3.5 397B A17BQwen3.7 FlashLeader
IFBench78.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)77.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
DTBench87.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMCA37.9%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text1437Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1424Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1402Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision1262Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: English1443Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: non-English1430Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1498Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: German1445Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1429Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: Korean1384Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: French1462Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1441Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: Russian1430Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: Polish1447Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1446Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1441Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1415Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1399Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: English1268Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1314Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1271Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: humor1262Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1230Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1265Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1260Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Qwen3.7 Flash
BenchmarkQwen3.5 397B A17BQwen3.7 FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Qwen3.5 397B A17B$0.0016Fits in one request
Qwen3.7 Flash$0.0001Fits in one request

Qwen3.7 Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Qwen3.5 397B A17B$0.027Fits in one request
Qwen3.7 Flash$0.0019Fits in one request

Qwen3.7 Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Qwen3.5 397B A17B$0.101Fits in one request
Qwen3.7 Flash$0.0073Fits in one request

Qwen3.7 Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Qwen3.7 Flash
SpecificationQwen3.5 397B A17BQwen3.7 Flash
MakerQwenQwen
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedFebruary 16, 2026July 27, 2026
Context window262K1M
Input $/Mtok$0.39$0.03
Output $/Mtok$2.34$0.13
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it10
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Qwen3.5 397B A17B better than Qwen3.7 Flash for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5 397B A17B or Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs $0.39 per million input tokens and $2.34 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Flash costs $0.03 and $0.13. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3.5 397B A17B or Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Qwen3.7 Flash comparison based on?

6 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Qwen3.5 397B A17B's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Qwen3.7 Flash's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next