Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B vs Solar Mini 4

Solar Mini 4 leads Qwen3.5-35B-A3B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 24.1 to 19.3, and Solar Mini 4 costs 6.5x less per output token ($0.20 vs $1.30 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 3 benchmarks have a result for both.

Qwen3.5-35B-A3BQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
53.5
Output $/M
$1.30
0
Solar Mini 4Upstage
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.20
3
vs boards won of 3 shared

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B or Solar Mini 4: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen3.5-35B-A3B for work measured by AA Intelligence Index or Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Shared results
3
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B only
42
Solar Mini 4 only
4
Like-for-like categories
3 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B not benchmarked, Solar Mini 4 not benchmarked.
Widest category
General, 11.3 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 72.0% against Solar Mini 4 83.3%, 11.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B $1.30 against Solar Mini 4 $0.20 per million output tokens, 6.5x apart.
Context window
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B takes 262K tokens, Solar Mini 4 524K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryQwen3.5-35B-A3BBarsSolar Mini 4Ties
Intelligence01
Reasoning01
General01
All shared boards03
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index8 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Qwen3.5-35B-A3B and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkQwen3.5-35B-A3BSolar Mini 4Leader
LMArena WebDev1254Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
SciCodeNot measured47.6%Only Solar Mini 4 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)26.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
ALE-Bench221.8Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: coding1410Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1415Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena WebDev: React1238Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1301Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Qwen3.5-35B-A3B and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkQwen3.5-35B-A3BSolar Mini 4Leader
AA Intelligence Index19.324.1Solar Mini 4
Epoch Capabilities Index142.5Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Qwen3.5-35B-A3B and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkQwen3.5-35B-A3BSolar Mini 4Leader
τ²-Bench Telecom89.2%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
Vending-Bench 2$463Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Reasoning benchmarks for Qwen3.5-35B-A3B and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkQwen3.5-35B-A3BSolar Mini 4Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)84.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)21.0%25.8%Solar Mini 4
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)83.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1400Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: expert1408Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1411Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Qwen3.5-35B-A3B and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkQwen3.5-35B-A3BSolar Mini 4Leader
OTIS Mock AIME70.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: math1404Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1410Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Qwen3.5-35B-A3B and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkQwen3.5-35B-A3BSolar Mini 4Leader
LMArena Text: science1413Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1421Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1399Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1394Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Qwen3.5-35B-A3B and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkQwen3.5-35B-A3BSolar Mini 4Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1158Only Solar Mini 4 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1106Only Solar Mini 4 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1150Only Solar Mini 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
General benchmarks for Qwen3.5-35B-A3B and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkQwen3.5-35B-A3BSolar Mini 4Leader
IFBench72.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)72.0%83.3%Solar Mini 4
DTBench80.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMCA29.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text1395Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1379Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1347Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: English1407Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: non-English1378Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1457Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: German1367Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1326Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: Korean1355Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: French1412Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1390Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: Russian1376Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: Polish1385Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1390Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1389Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1365Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1347Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Qwen3.5-35B-A3B and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkQwen3.5-35B-A3BSolar Mini 4Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B$0.0008Fits in one request
Solar Mini 4$0.0001Fits in one request

Solar Mini 4 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B$0.012Fits in one request
Solar Mini 4$0.0031Fits in one request

Solar Mini 4 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B$0.045Fits in one request
Solar Mini 4$0.012Fits in one request

Solar Mini 4 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Qwen3.5-35B-A3B and Solar Mini 4
SpecificationQwen3.5-35B-A3BUpstage Solar Mini 4
MakerQwenUpstage
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedFebruary 25, 2026September 23, 2026
Context window262K524K
Input $/Mtok$0.1625$0.05
Output $/Mtok$1.30$0.20
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it10
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Qwen3.5-35B-A3B better than Solar Mini 4 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3.5-35B-A3B for work measured by AA Intelligence Index or Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5-35B-A3B or Solar Mini 4?

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B costs $0.1625 per million input tokens and $1.30 per million output tokens; Solar Mini 4 costs $0.05 and $0.20. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3.5-35B-A3B or Solar Mini 4?

Solar Mini 4, with 524K tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Qwen3.5-35B-A3B vs Solar Mini 4 comparison based on?

3 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Qwen3.5-35B-A3B's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Solar Mini 4's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next