Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B vs Hy3

Hy3 costs 2.5x less per output token than Qwen3.5-35B-A3B ($0.528 vs $1.30 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 35 benchmarks have a result for both.

Qwen3.5-35B-A3BQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
53.5
Output $/M
$1.30
0
Hy3Tencent
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.528
35
vs boards won of 35 shared

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B or Hy3: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen3.5-35B-A3B for work measured by LMArena WebDev or ALE-Bench, where it leads.

Shared results
35
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B only
10
Hy3 only
9
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B not benchmarked, Hy3 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Coding, 25.1 points apart on average over 6 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena WebDev: React: Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 1238 against Hy3 1511, 45.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B $1.30 against Hy3 $0.528 per million output tokens, 2.5x apart.
Context window
Both take 262K tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryQwen3.5-35B-A3BBarsHy3Ties
Coding06
Reasoning05
Math02
Knowledge04
General018
All shared boards035
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index06
Coding benchmarks for Qwen3.5-35B-A3B and Hy3
BenchmarkQwen3.5-35B-A3BHy3Leader
LMArena WebDev12541507Hy3
SciCodeNot measured48.6%Only Hy3 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)26.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
ALE-Bench221.8838.6Hy3
LMArena Text: coding14101466Hy3
LMArena Text: software and IT14151463Hy3
LMArena WebDev: React12381511Hy3
LMArena WebDev: HTML13011487Hy3
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Qwen3.5-35B-A3B and Hy3
BenchmarkQwen3.5-35B-A3BHy3Leader
AA Intelligence Index19.3Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
Epoch Capabilities Index142.5Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Qwen3.5-35B-A3B and Hy3
BenchmarkQwen3.5-35B-A3BHy3Leader
τ²-Bench Telecom89.2%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
Vending-Bench 2$463Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for Qwen3.5-35B-A3B and Hy3
BenchmarkQwen3.5-35B-A3BHy3Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)84.5%89.7%Hy3
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)21.0%33.5%Hy3
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)83.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14001447Hy3
LMArena Text: expert14081461Hy3
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14111455Hy3
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Qwen3.5-35B-A3B and Hy3
BenchmarkQwen3.5-35B-A3BHy3Leader
OTIS Mock AIME70.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: math14041473Hy3
LMArena Text: mathematical work14101482Hy3
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Qwen3.5-35B-A3B and Hy3
BenchmarkQwen3.5-35B-A3BHy3Leader
LMArena Text: science14131457Hy3
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14211452Hy3
LMArena Text: legal and government13991422Hy3
LMArena Text: business and finance13941424Hy3
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Qwen3.5-35B-A3B and Hy3
BenchmarkQwen3.5-35B-A3BHy3Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1230Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1204Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1208Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1165Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1232Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1226Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1200Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1152Only Hy3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index018
General benchmarks for Qwen3.5-35B-A3B and Hy3
BenchmarkQwen3.5-35B-A3BHy3Leader
IFBench72.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)72.0%79.0%Hy3
DTBench80.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMCA29.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text13951438Hy3
LMArena Text: instruction following13791426Hy3
LMArena Text: creative writing13471403Hy3
LMArena Text: English14071448Hy3
LMArena Text: non-English13781426Hy3
LMArena Text: Chinese14571485Hy3
LMArena Text: German13671449Hy3
LMArena Text: Japanese13261397Hy3
LMArena Text: Korean13551396Hy3
LMArena Text: French14121456Hy3
LMArena Text: Spanish13901457Hy3
LMArena Text: Russian13761432Hy3
LMArena Text: Polish13851447Hy3
LMArena Text: multi-turn13901436Hy3
LMArena Text: longer queries13891442Hy3
LMArena Text: writing and language13651414Hy3
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13471400Hy3
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Qwen3.5-35B-A3B and Hy3
BenchmarkQwen3.5-35B-A3BHy3Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B$0.0008Fits in one request
Hy3$0.0004Fits in one request

Hy3 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B$0.012Fits in one request
Hy3$0.0082Fits in one request

Hy3 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B$0.045Fits in one request
Hy3$0.032Fits in one request

Hy3 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Qwen3.5-35B-A3B and Hy3
SpecificationQwen3.5-35B-A3BTencent Hy3
MakerQwenTencent
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedFebruary 25, 2026July 6, 2026
Context window262K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.1625$0.132
Output $/Mtok$1.30$0.528
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it11
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Qwen3.5-35B-A3B better than Hy3 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3.5-35B-A3B for work measured by LMArena WebDev or ALE-Bench, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5-35B-A3B or Hy3?

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B costs $0.1625 per million input tokens and $1.30 per million output tokens; Hy3 costs $0.132 and $0.528. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3.5-35B-A3B or Hy3?

Neither: both take 262K tokens.

How many benchmarks is the Qwen3.5-35B-A3B vs Hy3 comparison based on?

35 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Qwen3.5-35B-A3B's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Hy3's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next