Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B leads Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 19.3 to 9.5, and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking costs 1.3x less per output token ($1.00 vs $1.30 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; 1 benchmarks have a result for both.

Qwen3.5-35B-A3BQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
53.5
Output $/M
$1.30
1
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.00
0
vs boards won of 1 shared

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
1
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B only
45
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking only
0
Like-for-like categories
1 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B not benchmarked, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking not benchmarked.
Widest category
Intelligence, 9.8 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AA Intelligence Index: Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 19.3 against Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking 9.5, 9.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B $1.30 against Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking $1.00 per million output tokens, 1.3x apart.
Context window
Both take 262K tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryQwen3.5-35B-A3BBarsQwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingTies
Intelligence10
All shared boards10
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index7 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Qwen3.5-35B-A3B and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
BenchmarkQwen3.5-35B-A3BQwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingLeader
LMArena WebDev1254Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)26.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
ALE-Bench221.8Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: coding1410Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1415Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena WebDev: React1238Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1301Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 36 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Qwen3.5-35B-A3B and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
BenchmarkQwen3.5-35B-A3BQwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingLeader
AA Intelligence Index19.39.5Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
Epoch Capabilities Index142.5Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Qwen3.5-35B-A3B and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
BenchmarkQwen3.5-35B-A3BQwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingLeader
τ²-Bench Telecom89.2%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
Vending-Bench 2$463Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Qwen3.5-35B-A3B and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
BenchmarkQwen3.5-35B-A3BQwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)84.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)21.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)83.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1400Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: expert1407Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1411Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Qwen3.5-35B-A3B and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
BenchmarkQwen3.5-35B-A3BQwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingLeader
OTIS Mock AIME70.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: math1404Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1410Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
MathArena14.7%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Qwen3.5-35B-A3B and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
BenchmarkQwen3.5-35B-A3BQwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingLeader
LMArena Text: science1413Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1421Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1398Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1394Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Qwen3.5-35B-A3B and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
BenchmarkQwen3.5-35B-A3BQwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index21 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Qwen3.5-35B-A3B and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
BenchmarkQwen3.5-35B-A3BQwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingLeader
IFBench72.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)72.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
DTBench80.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMCA29.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text1395Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1379Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1347Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: English1407Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: non-English1378Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1456Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: German1367Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1326Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: Korean1354Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: French1413Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1390Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: Russian1377Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: Polish1385Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1390Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1389Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1365Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1347Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Qwen3.5-35B-A3B and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
BenchmarkQwen3.5-35B-A3BQwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B$0.0008Fits in one request
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking$0.0008Fits in one request

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B$0.012Fits in one request
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking$0.018Fits in one request

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B$0.045Fits in one request
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking$0.068Fits in one request

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Qwen3.5-35B-A3B and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
SpecificationQwen3.5-35B-A3BQwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
MakerQwenQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedFebruary 25, 2026October 6, 2025
Context window262K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.1625$0.29
Output $/Mtok$1.30$1.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it10
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Qwen3.5-35B-A3B better than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5-35B-A3B or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B costs $0.1625 per million input tokens and $1.30 per million output tokens; Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking costs $0.29 and $1.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3.5-35B-A3B or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Neither: both take 262K tokens.

How many benchmarks is the Qwen3.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking comparison based on?

1 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 23, 2026. Qwen3.5-35B-A3B's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next