LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Qwen3 32B vs Solar Pro 4

Updated October 21, 2026. 28 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Replace Qwen3 32B Replace Solar Pro 4
Qwen3 32BQwen
Coding
40.0
Overall
7.3
Output $/M
$0.28
0
Solar Pro 4Upstage
Coding
24.4
Overall
28.2
Output $/M
$0.60
28
vs boards won of 28 shared

Decision reading

Pick Qwen3 32B for coding: it scores 40.0 on the Vibe Coding Index against 24.4 for Solar Pro 4.

Pick Solar Pro 4 when the context window is larger, 524K against 131K tokens, or when what matters is SciCode or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.

Model AQwen3 32BQwen40.0/1001 independent benchmarkNo cost per solved taskModel BSolar Pro 4Upstage24.4/1001 independent benchmarkNo cost per solved task
Shared results
28
Qwen3 32B only
14
Solar Pro 4 only
17
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Qwen3 32B 40.0 from 1 benchmark, Solar Pro 4 24.4 from 1 benchmark.
Widest category
Intelligence, 20.9 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): Qwen3 32B 0.0% against Solar Pro 4 70.7%, 70.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Qwen3 32B $0.28 against Solar Pro 4 $0.60 per million output tokens, 2.1x apart.
Context window
Qwen3 32B takes 131K tokens, Solar Pro 4 524K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryQwen3 32BBarsSolar Pro 4Ties
Coding03
Intelligence01
Reasoning05
Math02
Knowledge04
General013
All shared boards028
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
Coding benchmarks for Qwen3 32B and Solar Pro 4
BenchmarkQwen3 32BSolar Pro 4Leader
Aider polyglot40.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 32B measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1371Only Solar Pro 4 measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured52.7Only Solar Pro 4 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)54.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 32B measured
SciCode36.0%48.0%Solar Pro 4
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)3.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 32B measured
ALE-BenchNot measured179.3Only Solar Pro 4 measured
LMArena Text: coding13571438Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: software and IT13661431Solar Pro 4
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1363Only Solar Pro 4 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1371Only Solar Pro 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Qwen3 32B and Solar Pro 4
BenchmarkQwen3 32BSolar Pro 4Leader
AA Intelligence Index7.328.2Solar Pro 4
Epoch Capabilities Index138.4Not measuredOnly Qwen3 32B measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Qwen3 32B and Solar Pro 4
BenchmarkQwen3 32BSolar Pro 4Leader
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1105Only Solar Pro 4 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom29.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 32B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for Qwen3 32B and Solar Pro 4
BenchmarkQwen3 32BSolar Pro 4Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)66.8%89.1%Solar Pro 4
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)7.4%29.8%Solar Pro 4
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)65.7%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 32B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13341400Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: expert13621428Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13501427Solar Pro 4
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Qwen3 32B and Solar Pro 4
BenchmarkQwen3 32BSolar Pro 4Leader
AA Math Index73.0Not measuredOnly Qwen3 32B measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)73.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 32B measured
OTIS Mock AIME66.9%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 32B measured
LMArena Text: math13991421Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: mathematical work14201427Solar Pro 4
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Qwen3 32B and Solar Pro 4
BenchmarkQwen3 32BSolar Pro 4Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)79.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 32B measured
LMArena Text: science13721404Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13681374Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: legal and government13241383Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: business and finance13181381Solar Pro 4
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Qwen3 32B and Solar Pro 4
BenchmarkQwen3 32BSolar Pro 4Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1176Only Solar Pro 4 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1150Only Solar Pro 4 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1170Only Solar Pro 4 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1177Only Solar Pro 4 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1178Only Solar Pro 4 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1182Only Solar Pro 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index013
General benchmarks for Qwen3 32B and Solar Pro 4
BenchmarkQwen3 32BSolar Pro 4Leader
IFBench36.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 32B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)0.0%70.7%Solar Pro 4
DTBench67.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 32B measured
LMCA17.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 32B measured
Fiction.LiveBench74.2%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 32B measured
LMArena Text13401388Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: instruction following13051375Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: creative writing12971317Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: English13591414Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: non-English13171363Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: Chinese13571422Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: German13411358Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1320Only Solar Pro 4 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1383Only Solar Pro 4 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1400Only Solar Pro 4 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1409Only Solar Pro 4 measured
LMArena Text: Russian13111357Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1304Only Solar Pro 4 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn13311385Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: longer queries13271382Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: writing and language12981344Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12791332Solar Pro 4
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Qwen3 32B and Solar Pro 4
BenchmarkQwen3 32BSolar Pro 4Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Qwen3 32B$0.0002Fits in one request
Solar Pro 4$0.0004Fits in one request

Qwen3 32B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Qwen3 32B$0.0048Fits in one request
Solar Pro 4$0.0093Fits in one request

Qwen3 32B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Qwen3 32B$0.019Exceeds the context window
Solar Pro 4$0.036Fits in one request

Qwen3 32B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Qwen3 32B and Solar Pro 4
SpecificationQwen3 32BUpstage Solar Pro 4
MakerQwenUpstage
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedApril 28, 2025August 10, 2026
Context window131K524K
Input $/Mtok$0.08$0.15
Output $/Mtok$0.28$0.60
Coding index40.024.4
Independent measurements behind it11
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Qwen3 32B better than Solar Pro 4 for coding?

Pick Qwen3 32B for coding: it scores 40.0 on the Vibe Coding Index against 24.4 for Solar Pro 4. Pick Solar Pro 4 when the context window is larger, 524K against 131K tokens, or when what matters is SciCode or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 32B or Solar Pro 4?

Qwen3 32B costs $0.08 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Solar Pro 4 costs $0.15 and $0.60. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3 32B or Solar Pro 4?

Solar Pro 4, with 524K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Qwen3 32B vs Solar Pro 4 comparison based on?

28 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Qwen3 32B's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Solar Pro 4's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next