Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Qwen3 32B vs Hy3 preview

Hy3 preview leads Qwen3 32B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 25.3 to 7.3, and Qwen3 32B costs 1.5x less per output token ($0.40 vs $0.60 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 29 benchmarks have a result for both.

Replace Qwen3 32B Replace Hy3 preview
Qwen3 32BQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
40.8
Output $/M
$0.40
0
Hy3 previewTencent
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.60
29
vs boards won of 29 shared

Qwen3 32B or Hy3 preview: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen3 32B for output tokens 1.5x cheaper ($0.40 vs $0.60 per million) and work measured by Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.

Model AQwen3 32BQwenNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved taskModel BHy3 previewTencentNot benchmarked1 independent benchmarkNo cost per solved task
Shared results
29
Qwen3 32B only
16
Hy3 preview only
7
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Qwen3 32B not benchmarked, Hy3 preview not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 62.9 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): Qwen3 32B 0.0% against Hy3 preview 64.7%, 64.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Qwen3 32B $0.40 against Hy3 preview $0.60 per million output tokens, 1.5x apart.
Context window
Qwen3 32B takes 131K tokens, Hy3 preview 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryQwen3 32BBarsHy3 previewTies
Coding03
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning05
Math02
Knowledge04
General013
All shared boards029
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
Coding benchmarks for Qwen3 32B and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkQwen3 32BHy3 previewLeader
Aider polyglot40.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 32B measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1357Only Hy3 preview measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured58.8Only Hy3 preview measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)54.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 32B measured
SciCode36.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 32B measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)3.0%34.1%Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: coding13571421Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: software and IT13661423Hy3 preview
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1349Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1356Only Hy3 preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Qwen3 32B and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkQwen3 32BHy3 previewLeader
AA Intelligence Index7.325.3Hy3 preview
Epoch Capabilities Index138.4Not measuredOnly Qwen3 32B measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Qwen3 32B and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkQwen3 32BHy3 previewLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured24.1Only Hy3 preview measured
τ²-Bench Telecom29.8%92.7%Hy3 preview
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)48.7%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 32B measured
BrowseComp-Plus10.7%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 32B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for Qwen3 32B and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkQwen3 32BHy3 previewLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)66.8%86.7%Hy3 preview
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)7.4%27.8%Hy3 preview
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)65.7%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 32B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13341413Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: expert13621422Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13501416Hy3 preview
Kagi LLM Benchmark48.7%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 32B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Qwen3 32B and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkQwen3 32BHy3 previewLeader
AA Math Index73.0Not measuredOnly Qwen3 32B measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)73.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 32B measured
OTIS Mock AIME66.9%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 32B measured
LMArena Text: math13991424Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: mathematical work14201442Hy3 preview
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Qwen3 32B and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkQwen3 32BHy3 previewLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)79.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 32B measured
LMArena Text: science13721416Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13681405Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: legal and government13241430Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: business and finance13181397Hy3 preview
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Qwen3 32B and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkQwen3 32BHy3 previewLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index013
General benchmarks for Qwen3 32B and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkQwen3 32BHy3 previewLeader
IFBench36.3%63.1%Hy3 preview
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)0.0%64.7%Hy3 preview
DTBench67.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 32B measured
LMCA17.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 32B measured
Fiction.LiveBench74.2%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 32B measured
LMArena Text13401401Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: instruction following13051383Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: creative writing12971339Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: English13591409Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: non-English13171390Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: Chinese13571435Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: German1341Not measuredOnly Qwen3 32B measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1425Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1399Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: Russian13111399Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: multi-turn13311411Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: longer queries13271402Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: writing and language12981370Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12791352Hy3 preview
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Qwen3 32B and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkQwen3 32BHy3 previewLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Qwen3 32B$0.0003Fits in one request
Hy3 preview$0.0005Fits in one request

Qwen3 32B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Qwen3 32B$0.0082Fits in one request
Hy3 preview$0.011Fits in one request

Qwen3 32B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Qwen3 32B$0.032Exceeds the context window
Hy3 preview$0.042Fits in one request

Qwen3 32B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Qwen3 32B and Hy3 preview
SpecificationQwen3 32BTencent Hy3 preview
MakerQwenTencent
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedApril 28, 2025April 22, 2026
Context window131K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.14$0.18
Output $/Mtok$0.40$0.60
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Qwen3 32B better than Hy3 preview for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3 32B for output tokens 1.5x cheaper ($0.40 vs $0.60 per million) and work measured by Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 32B or Hy3 preview?

Qwen3 32B costs $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Hy3 preview costs $0.18 and $0.60. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3 32B or Hy3 preview?

Hy3 preview, with 262K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Qwen3 32B vs Hy3 preview comparison based on?

29 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Qwen3 32B's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Hy3 preview's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next