Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Qwen3 30B A3B vs Solar Pro 4

Solar Pro 4 leads Qwen3 30B A3B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 28.2 to 7.6, and Qwen3 30B A3B costs 1.2x less per output token ($0.50 vs $0.60 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; 37 benchmarks have a result for both.

Replace Qwen3 30B A3B Replace Solar Pro 4
Qwen3 30B A3BQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
38.2
Output $/M
$0.50
0
Solar Pro 4Upstage
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.60
37
vs boards won of 37 shared

Qwen3 30B A3B or Solar Pro 4: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen3 30B A3B for output tokens 1.2x cheaper ($0.50 vs $0.60 per million) and work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Model AQwen3 30B A3BQwenNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved taskModel BSolar Pro 4UpstageNot benchmarked1 independent benchmarkNo cost per solved task
Shared results
37
Qwen3 30B A3B only
16
Solar Pro 4 only
8
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Qwen3 30B A3B not benchmarked, Solar Pro 4 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Web design, 28.7 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): Qwen3 30B A3B 0.0% against Solar Pro 4 70.7%, 70.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Qwen3 30B A3B $0.50 against Solar Pro 4 $0.60 per million output tokens, 1.2x apart.
Context window
Qwen3 30B A3B takes 41K tokens, Solar Pro 4 524K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryQwen3 30B A3BBarsSolar Pro 4Ties
Coding02
Intelligence01
Reasoning05
Math02
Knowledge04
Web design05
General018
All shared boards037
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for Qwen3 30B A3B and Solar Pro 4
BenchmarkQwen3 30B A3BSolar Pro 4Leader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1370Only Solar Pro 4 measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured52.7Only Solar Pro 4 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)50.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B measured
SciCodeNot measured48.0%Only Solar Pro 4 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)6.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B measured
WeirdML29.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B measured
ALE-BenchNot measured179.3Only Solar Pro 4 measured
LMArena Text: coding13371437Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: software and IT13401431Solar Pro 4
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1363Only Solar Pro 4 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1371Only Solar Pro 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Qwen3 30B A3B and Solar Pro 4
BenchmarkQwen3 30B A3BSolar Pro 4Leader
AA Intelligence Index7.628.2Solar Pro 4
Epoch Capabilities Index137.3Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Qwen3 30B A3B and Solar Pro 4
BenchmarkQwen3 30B A3BSolar Pro 4Leader
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1105Only Solar Pro 4 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom26.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for Qwen3 30B A3B and Solar Pro 4
BenchmarkQwen3 30B A3BSolar Pro 4Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)61.6%89.1%Solar Pro 4
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)6.2%29.8%Solar Pro 4
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)61.7%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13141400Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: expert13141428Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13291428Solar Pro 4
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Qwen3 30B A3B and Solar Pro 4
BenchmarkQwen3 30B A3BSolar Pro 4Leader
AA Math Index72.3Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)72.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B measured
OTIS Mock AIME62.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: math13551417Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: mathematical work13631423Solar Pro 4
MathArena9.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Qwen3 30B A3B and Solar Pro 4
BenchmarkQwen3 30B A3BSolar Pro 4Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)77.7%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: science13211403Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13181374Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: legal and government13141384Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: business and finance13081381Solar Pro 4
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Web design benchmarks for Qwen3 30B A3B and Solar Pro 4
BenchmarkQwen3 30B A3BSolar Pro 4Leader
Design Arena: websites9541176Solar Pro 4
Design Arena: UI components9431147Solar Pro 4
Design Arena: game dev8981169Solar Pro 4
Design Arena: data viz9671178Solar Pro 4
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1179Only Solar Pro 4 measured
Design Arena: all code categories9411182Solar Pro 4
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index018
General benchmarks for Qwen3 30B A3B and Solar Pro 4
BenchmarkQwen3 30B A3BSolar Pro 4Leader
IFBench41.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)0.0%70.7%Solar Pro 4
DTBench60.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMCA15.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Fiction.LiveBench40.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)75.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text13171388Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: instruction following12831374Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: creative writing12711318Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: English13351415Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: non-English12951363Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: Chinese13471423Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: German13071357Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: Japanese12541320Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: Korean12611391Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: French13521403Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: Spanish13171413Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: Russian12911354Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: Polish12991307Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: multi-turn13071387Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: longer queries13121382Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: writing and language12901344Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12581333Solar Pro 4
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Qwen3 30B A3B and Solar Pro 4
BenchmarkQwen3 30B A3BSolar Pro 4Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Qwen3 30B A3B$0.0004Fits in one request
Solar Pro 4$0.0004Fits in one request

Qwen3 30B A3B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Qwen3 30B A3B$0.0075Exceeds the context window
Solar Pro 4$0.0093Fits in one request

Qwen3 30B A3B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Qwen3 30B A3B$0.029Exceeds the context window
Solar Pro 4$0.036Fits in one request

Qwen3 30B A3B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Qwen3 30B A3B and Solar Pro 4
SpecificationQwen3 30B A3BUpstage Solar Pro 4
MakerQwenUpstage
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedApril 28, 2025August 10, 2026
Context window41K524K
Input $/Mtok$0.12$0.15
Output $/Mtok$0.50$0.60
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Qwen3 30B A3B better than Solar Pro 4 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3 30B A3B for output tokens 1.2x cheaper ($0.50 vs $0.60 per million) and work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 30B A3B or Solar Pro 4?

Qwen3 30B A3B costs $0.12 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; Solar Pro 4 costs $0.15 and $0.60. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3 30B A3B or Solar Pro 4?

Solar Pro 4, with 524K tokens against 41K.

How many benchmarks is the Qwen3 30B A3B vs Solar Pro 4 comparison based on?

37 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 23, 2026. Qwen3 30B A3B's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Solar Pro 4's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next