Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Qwen3 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-9B

Qwen3.5-9B leads Qwen3 30B A3B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 13.3 to 7.6, and Qwen3.5-9B costs 3.3x less per output token ($0.15 vs $0.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 12 benchmarks have a result for both.

Qwen3 30B A3BQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
38.2
Output $/M
$0.50
1
Qwen3.5-9BQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.15
11
vs boards won of 12 shared

Qwen3 30B A3B or Qwen3.5-9B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen3 30B A3B for work measured by Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) or AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Shared results
12
Qwen3 30B A3B only
40
Qwen3.5-9B only
3
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Qwen3 30B A3B not benchmarked, Qwen3.5-9B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 60.8 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): Qwen3 30B A3B 0.0% against Qwen3.5-9B 70.0%, 70.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Qwen3 30B A3B $0.50 against Qwen3.5-9B $0.15 per million output tokens, 3.3x apart.
Context window
Qwen3 30B A3B takes 41K tokens, Qwen3.5-9B 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryQwen3 30B A3BBarsQwen3.5-9BTies
Coding01
Intelligence02
Agentic work01
Reasoning03
Math10
General04
All shared boards111
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index01
Coding benchmarks for Qwen3 30B A3B and Qwen3.5-9B
BenchmarkQwen3 30B A3BQwen3.5-9BLeader
AA Coding IndexNot measured23.5Only Qwen3.5-9B measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)50.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B measured
SciCodeNot measured29.5%Only Qwen3.5-9B measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)6.8%24.2%Qwen3.5-9B
Terminal-BenchNot measured9.2%Only Qwen3.5-9B measured
WeirdML29.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: coding1337Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1340Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for Qwen3 30B A3B and Qwen3.5-9B
BenchmarkQwen3 30B A3BQwen3.5-9BLeader
AA Intelligence Index7.613.3Qwen3.5-9B
Epoch Capabilities Index137.3139.3Qwen3.5-9B
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Qwen3 30B A3B and Qwen3.5-9B
BenchmarkQwen3 30B A3BQwen3.5-9BLeader
τ²-Bench Telecom26.0%86.8%Qwen3.5-9B
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Reasoning benchmarks for Qwen3 30B A3B and Qwen3.5-9B
BenchmarkQwen3 30B A3BQwen3.5-9BLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)61.6%80.6%Qwen3.5-9B
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)6.2%14.9%Qwen3.5-9B
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)61.7%79.0%Qwen3.5-9B
LMArena Text: hard prompts1314Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: expert1314Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1329Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Math benchmarks for Qwen3 30B A3B and Qwen3.5-9B
BenchmarkQwen3 30B A3BQwen3.5-9BLeader
AA Math Index72.3Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)72.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B measured
OTIS Mock AIME62.8%61.7%Qwen3 30B A3B
LMArena Text: math1355Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1363Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Qwen3 30B A3B and Qwen3.5-9B
BenchmarkQwen3 30B A3BQwen3.5-9BLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)77.7%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: science1321Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1318Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1314Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1309Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Qwen3 30B A3B and Qwen3.5-9B
BenchmarkQwen3 30B A3BQwen3.5-9BLeader
Design Arena: websites954Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Design Arena: UI components943Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Design Arena: game dev898Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Design Arena: data viz967Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Design Arena: all code categories941Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
General benchmarks for Qwen3 30B A3B and Qwen3.5-9B
BenchmarkQwen3 30B A3BQwen3.5-9BLeader
IFBench41.5%66.7%Qwen3.5-9B
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)0.0%70.0%Qwen3.5-9B
DTBench60.3%71.2%Qwen3.5-9B
LMCA15.8%24.5%Qwen3.5-9B
Fiction.LiveBench40.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)75.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text1317Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1283Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1271Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: English1335Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: non-English1295Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1347Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: German1307Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1254Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: Korean1261Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: French1352Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1317Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: Russian1291Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: Polish1299Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1307Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1312Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1290Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1258Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Qwen3 30B A3B and Qwen3.5-9B
BenchmarkQwen3 30B A3BQwen3.5-9BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Qwen3 30B A3B$0.0004Fits in one request
Qwen3.5-9B$0.0002Fits in one request

Qwen3.5-9B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Qwen3 30B A3B$0.0075Exceeds the context window
Qwen3.5-9B$0.0054Fits in one request

Qwen3.5-9B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Qwen3 30B A3B$0.029Exceeds the context window
Qwen3.5-9B$0.021Fits in one request

Qwen3.5-9B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Qwen3 30B A3B and Qwen3.5-9B
SpecificationQwen3 30B A3BQwen3.5-9B
MakerQwenQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedApril 28, 2025March 10, 2026
Context window41K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.12$0.10
Output $/Mtok$0.50$0.15
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Qwen3 30B A3B better than Qwen3.5-9B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3 30B A3B for work measured by Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) or AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 30B A3B or Qwen3.5-9B?

Qwen3 30B A3B costs $0.12 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5-9B costs $0.10 and $0.15. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3 30B A3B or Qwen3.5-9B?

Qwen3.5-9B, with 262K tokens against 41K.

How many benchmarks is the Qwen3 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-9B comparison based on?

12 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Qwen3 30B A3B's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.5-9B's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next