Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Qwen3.5 397B A17B leads Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 21.4 to 7.5, and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs 7.8x less per output token ($0.30 vs $2.34 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 40 benchmarks have a result for both.

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Qwen
Coding
No data
Overall
41.5
Output $/M
$0.30
0
Qwen3.5 397B A17BQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
57.1
Output $/M
$2.34
40
vs boards won of 40 shared

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 or Qwen3.5 397B A17B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 for output tokens 7.8x cheaper ($0.30 vs $2.34 per million) and work measured by SciCode or Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Shared results
40
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 only
5
Qwen3.5 397B A17B only
26
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 not benchmarked, Qwen3.5 397B A17B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 67.5 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 28.1% against Qwen3.5 397B A17B 95.6%, 67.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 $0.30 against Qwen3.5 397B A17B $2.34 per million output tokens, 7.8x apart.
Context window
Both take 262K tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507BarsQwen3.5 397B A17BTies
Coding04
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning06
Math03
Knowledge04
General021
All shared boards040
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index04
Coding benchmarks for Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Qwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1400Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)70.7%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
SciCode33.0%44.8%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)6.1%40.9%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
ALE-BenchNot measured621.9Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: coding14161464Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: software and IT14171463Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1388Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1410Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Qwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
AA Intelligence Index7.521.4Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured146.8Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Qwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
τ²-Bench Telecom28.1%95.6%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
APEX-AgentsNot measured24.9%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)41.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
Reasoning benchmarks for Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Qwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)70.7%89.3%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)10.3%29.0%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)55.6%86.4%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured18.0%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13981448Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: expert13971462Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14061450Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1277Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1292Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Math benchmarks for Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Qwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
AA Math Index66.3Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)66.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
OTIS Mock AIME62.2%88.9%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured31.2%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: math13941453Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: mathematical work14111454Qwen3.5 397B A17B
MathArenaNot measured19.2%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Qwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)80.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: science13931457Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13921455Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: legal and government13871441Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: business and finance13891435Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Qwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1190Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1161Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1140Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1175Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1160Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1179Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1139Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index021
General benchmarks for Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Qwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
IFBench50.7%78.8%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)61.3%77.3%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
DTBench67.2%87.5%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMCA22.4%37.9%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text13841437Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: instruction following13631424Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: creative writing13171402Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena VisionNot measured1262Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: English13911443Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: non-English13721430Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: Chinese14321498Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: German13791445Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: Japanese13371429Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: Korean13301384Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: French14191462Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: Spanish14041441Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: Russian13691430Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: Polish13531447Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: multi-turn13781446Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: longer queries13781441Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: writing and language13361415Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13341399Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1268Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1314Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1271Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1262Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1230Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1265Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1260Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Qwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507$0.0002Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 397B A17B$0.0016Fits in one request

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507$0.0054Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 397B A17B$0.027Fits in one request

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507$0.021Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 397B A17B$0.101Fits in one request

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
SpecificationQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Qwen3.5 397B A17B
MakerQwenQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 29, 2025February 16, 2026
Context window262K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.09$0.39
Output $/Mtok$0.30$2.34
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 better than Qwen3.5 397B A17B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 for output tokens 7.8x cheaper ($0.30 vs $2.34 per million) and work measured by SciCode or Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 or Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs $0.09 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs $0.39 and $2.34. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 or Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

Neither: both take 262K tokens.

How many benchmarks is the Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B comparison based on?

40 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.5 397B A17B's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next