Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B

Qwen3.6 35B A3B leads Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 18.2 to 12.7, and Qwen3.6 35B A3B costs 3.5x less per output token ($1.00 vs $3.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 9 benchmarks have a result for both.

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Qwen
Coding
No data
Overall
52.9
Output $/M
$3.50
2
Qwen3.6 35B A3BQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
45.0
Output $/M
$1.00
6
vs boards won of 9 shared, 1 tied

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 or Qwen3.6 35B A3B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 for work measured by AA Coding Index or AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Shared results
9
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 only
37
Qwen3.6 35B A3B only
11
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 not benchmarked, Qwen3.6 35B A3B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Coding, 13.2 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
AA Coding Index: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 22.1 against Qwen3.6 35B A3B 41.9, 19.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 $3.50 against Qwen3.6 35B A3B $1.00 per million output tokens, 3.5x apart.
Context window
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 takes 128K tokens, Qwen3.6 35B A3B 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507BarsQwen3.6 35B A3BTies
Coding11
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning02
Math001 tie
General11
All shared boards261 tie
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index11
Coding benchmarks for Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Qwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
AA Coding Index22.141.9Qwen3.6 35B A3B
SciCodeNot measured36.6%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured34.8%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
Terminal-BenchNot measured24.6%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
WeirdML41.0%34.5%Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: coding1424Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1431Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 36 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Qwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
AA Intelligence Index12.718.2Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured143.7Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Qwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
AA Agentic Index1.313.1Qwen3.6 35B A3B
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured95.3%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
Vending-Bench 2-$11Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Qwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured84.1%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured22.2%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)80.1%84.8%Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Mystery game puzzles9.0%22.0%Qwen3.6 35B A3B
LMArena Text: hard prompts1416Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: expert1463Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1432Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index00
Math benchmarks for Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Qwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
OTIS Mock AIME86.7%86.7%Tie
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured20.4%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
LMArena Text: math1412Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1435Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Qwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
SimpleQA Verified40.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: science1433Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1456Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1415Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1413Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Qwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
Design Arena: websites1052Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Design Arena: UI components942Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Design Arena: game dev956Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Design Arena: data viz950Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Design Arena: 3D997Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1032Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
General benchmarks for Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Qwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
IFBenchNot measured64.4%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured71.7%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
DTBench80.3%73.9%Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMCA29.3%29.7%Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Fiction.LiveBench75.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)82.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured44.4%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
LMArena Text1415Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1386Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1384Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: English1429Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1397Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1481Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: German1408Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1386Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1375Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1389Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1401Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1390Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1406Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1400Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1388Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1370Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Qwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507$0.0022Fits in one request
Qwen3.6 35B A3B$0.0006Fits in one request

Qwen3.6 35B A3B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507$0.033Fits in one request
Qwen3.6 35B A3B$0.0080Fits in one request

Qwen3.6 35B A3B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507$0.125Exceeds the context window
Qwen3.6 35B A3B$0.030Fits in one request

Qwen3.6 35B A3B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
SpecificationQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Qwen3.6 35B A3B
MakerQwenQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 25, 2025April 27, 2026
Context window128K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.45$0.10
Output $/Mtok$3.50$1.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 better than Qwen3.6 35B A3B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 for work measured by AA Coding Index or AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 or Qwen3.6 35B A3B?

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs $0.45 per million input tokens and $3.50 per million output tokens; Qwen3.6 35B A3B costs $0.10 and $1.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 or Qwen3.6 35B A3B?

Qwen3.6 35B A3B, with 262K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B comparison based on?

9 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.6 35B A3B's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next