Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Qwen3.5 397B A17B leads Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 21.4 to 12.0, and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 costs 3.0x less per output token ($0.775 vs $2.34 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; 16 benchmarks have a result for both.

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Qwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.775
0
Qwen3.5 397B A17BQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
57.2
Output $/M
$2.34
16
vs boards won of 16 shared

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 or Qwen3.5 397B A17B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 for output tokens 3.0x cheaper ($0.775 vs $2.34 per million) and work measured by SciCode or Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Shared results
16
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 only
8
Qwen3.5 397B A17B only
50
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 not benchmarked, Qwen3.5 397B A17B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 42.4 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 53.2% against Qwen3.5 397B A17B 95.6%, 42.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 $0.775 against Qwen3.5 397B A17B $2.34 per million output tokens, 3.0x apart.
Context window
Both take 262K tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507BarsQwen3.5 397B A17BTies
Coding02
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning02
Web design06
General04
All shared boards016
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Qwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1400Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)78.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
SciCode41.4%44.8%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)15.2%40.9%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
WeirdML38.7%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured621.9Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1465Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1463Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1388Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1409Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Qwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
AA Intelligence Index12.021.4Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured146.8Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Qwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
τ²-Bench Telecom53.2%95.6%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
APEX-AgentsNot measured24.9%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)52.1%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Qwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)79.0%89.3%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)15.9%29.0%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured86.4%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
ARC-AGI11.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
ARC-AGI-21.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured18.0%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1448Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1462Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1450Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1277Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1292Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Qwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
AA Math Index91.0Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)91.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured88.9%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured31.2%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1454Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1454Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
MathArenaNot measured19.2%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Qwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)84.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1457Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1455Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1441Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1435Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
Web design benchmarks for Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Qwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
Design Arena: websites10581190Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Design Arena: UI components9631161Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Design Arena: game dev9511140Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Design Arena: data viz10701175Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Design Arena: 3D9951162Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Design Arena: all code categories10381179Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1139Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
General benchmarks for Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Qwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
IFBench51.2%78.8%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)72.0%77.3%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
DTBench78.4%87.5%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMCA23.5%37.9%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena TextNot measured1438Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1423Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1402Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1262Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1443Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1430Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1499Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1444Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1430Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1385Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1462Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1441Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1430Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1448Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1447Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1441Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1416Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1399Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1268Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1314Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1271Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1262Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1230Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1265Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1260Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Qwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507$0.0005Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 397B A17B$0.0016Fits in one request

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507$0.0096Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 397B A17B$0.027Fits in one request

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507$0.037Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 397B A17B$0.101Fits in one request

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
SpecificationQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Qwen3.5 397B A17B
MakerQwenQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 21, 2025February 16, 2026
Context window262K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.145$0.39
Output $/Mtok$0.775$2.34
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 better than Qwen3.5 397B A17B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 for output tokens 3.0x cheaper ($0.775 vs $2.34 per million) and work measured by SciCode or Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 or Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 costs $0.145 per million input tokens and $0.775 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs $0.39 and $2.34. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 or Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

Neither: both take 262K tokens.

How many benchmarks is the Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B comparison based on?

16 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 23, 2026. Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.5 397B A17B's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next