Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Hy-MT2-7B

Hy-MT2-7B costs 3.4x less per output token than Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct ($0.295 vs $1.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
6.7
Output $/M
$1.00
Hy-MT2-7BTencent
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.295
vs $1.00 vs $0.295 per 1M output tokens. Hy-MT2-7B is 3.4x cheaper.

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct or Hy-MT2-7B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct for a larger context window (33K against 8K tokens).

No benchmark has tested both yet. Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct has results on Aider polyglot, SWE-bench Verified and LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run); Hy-MT2-7B has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct not benchmarked, Hy-MT2-7B not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct $1.00 against Hy-MT2-7B $0.295 per million output tokens, 3.4x apart.
Context window
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct takes 33K tokens, Hy-MT2-7B 8K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index5 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Hy-MT2-7B
BenchmarkQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructHy-MT2-7BLeader
Aider polyglot16.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
SWE-bench Verified47.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)29.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: coding1276Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1261Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Hy-MT2-7B
BenchmarkQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructHy-MT2-7BLeader
AA Intelligence Index6.7Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
Epoch Capabilities Index119.5Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Hy-MT2-7B
BenchmarkQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructHy-MT2-7BLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)41.7%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)3.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1251Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: expert1221Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1269Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards measured
Math benchmarks for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Hy-MT2-7B
BenchmarkQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructHy-MT2-7BLeader
GSM8K93.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: math1251Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1243Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Hy-MT2-7B
BenchmarkQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructHy-MT2-7BLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)63.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
MMLU79.1%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
AI2 Reasoning Challenge70.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: science1221Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1187Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1257Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1224Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13 boards measured
General benchmarks for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Hy-MT2-7B
BenchmarkQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructHy-MT2-7BLeader
HellaSwag83.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
WinoGrande80.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text1230Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1223Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1174Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: English1248Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: non-English1205Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1222Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: Russian1228Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1222Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1251Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1191Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1150Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct$0.0012Fits in one request
Hy-MT2-7B$0.0002Fits in one request

Hy-MT2-7B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct$0.036Exceeds the context window
Hy-MT2-7B$0.0046Exceeds the context window

Hy-MT2-7B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct$0.142Exceeds the context window
Hy-MT2-7B$0.018Exceeds the context window

Hy-MT2-7B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Hy-MT2-7B
SpecificationQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructTencent Hy-MT2-7B
MakerQwenTencent
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedNovember 11, 2024August 19, 2026
Context window33K8K
Input $/Mtok$0.66$0.074
Output $/Mtok$1.00$0.295
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct better than Hy-MT2-7B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct for a larger context window (33K against 8K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct or Hy-MT2-7B?

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct costs $0.66 per million input tokens and $1.00 per million output tokens; Hy-MT2-7B costs $0.074 and $0.295. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct or Hy-MT2-7B?

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct, with 33K tokens against 8K.

Has any benchmark tested both Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Hy-MT2-7B?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct has results on Aider polyglot, SWE-bench Verified and LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run); Hy-MT2-7B has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next